首页> 外文会议>American Control Conference >Iterative unfalsified adaptive control: analysis of the disturbance-free case
【24h】

Iterative unfalsified adaptive control: analysis of the disturbance-free case

机译:迭代无突齐的自适应控制:无扰动案例分析

获取原文

摘要

The paradigm of classical linear system identification is to assume that the system generating the data belongs to an uncertainty model set consisting of unknown transfer function coefficients and unknown noise variances, e.g., [9]. However, thisuncertainty model set does not provide a means for estimating the size of the unmodeled dynamics, although formulae exist for large data length and large model order, e.g., [9, Ch.8]. A philosophical shift from identification to unfalsification allows the uncertainty model set to include dynamic uncertainty with an unknown bound which can be estimated (unfalsified) along with the usual system identification parameters.In this paper we will examine the use of uncertainty model unfalsification for direct and indirect iterative adaptive control. Specifically, we will analyze three approaches to iterative adaptive control: (1) indirect control design via classical systemidentification, (2) indirect control design via plant uncertainty model unfalsification, and (3) direct controller unfalsification. Each approach will be analyzed under the same simplifying assumptions: infinite data, the plant is linear-time-invariantand disturbance-free, and the iterative controller is also linear-time-invariant.
机译:经典线性系统标识的范例是假设生成数据的系统属于由未知传递函数系数和未知噪声差异组成的不确定性模型集,例如,[9]。然而,本文模型组不提供用于估计未拼接动态的大小的装置,尽管存在大数据长度和大型型号的公式,例如,[9,CH.8]。从识别到不建立的哲学转变允许不确定性模型设置为包括未知绑定的动态不确定性,可以估计(无法突出)以及通常的系统识别参数。在本文中,我们将研究使用不确定性模型无法直接使用的不确定性模型间接迭代自适应控制。具体而言,我们将分析迭代自适应控制的三种方法:(1)通过经典SystemIdentification,(2)通过植物不确定性模型的间接控制设计来分析间接控制设计,(3)直接控制器无法解决。将在相同的简化假设下进行分析每种方法:无限数据,工厂是线性时invariantand的无干扰,并且迭代控制器也是线性时不变的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号