首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Sustainable Design and Construction >Comparative Analysis of LEED-NCv3.0 with LEED-NCv2.2
【24h】

Comparative Analysis of LEED-NCv3.0 with LEED-NCv2.2

机译:LEED-NCv3.0与LEED-NCv2.2的比较分析

获取原文

摘要

Energy crisis and environmental awareness in the society has forced the construction industry to rethink the current design and construction practices, and adopt more sustainable approaches. To build sustainable environment and achieve optimum comfort, the construction industry utilizes various sustainability rating systems. Among the available rating systems, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) has emerged as one of the most adopted in United States. Since the initial launch in 1998, LEED has evolved over the years. This study presents a comparative analysis of the requirements for the credits/ prerequisites and measurement approach of the most recent LEED v3.0 in respect to the preceding LEED v2.2. Results indicate that requirements for majority of the credits have remained unchanged in LEED v3.0. A shift toward system based approach in LEED v3.0 was noticed in comparison to the preceding version. Finally, some recommendations have been offered for future version of LEED.
机译:社会上的能源危机和环境意识迫使建筑业重新考虑当前的设计和建筑实践,并采用更可持续的方法。为了营造可持续发展的环境并获得最佳的舒适度,建筑业采用了各种可持续发展的评级系统。在可用的评级系统中,能源与环境设计领导力(LEED)已成为美国采用最广泛的评级系统之一。自1998年首次推出以来,LEED多年来一直在发展。这项研究提供了相对于先前LEED v2.2的最新LEED v3.0的学分/先决条件要求和衡量方法的比较分析。结果表明,大多数积分的要求在LEED v3.0中保持不变。与先前版本相比,注意到LEED v3.0向基于系统的方法的转变。最后,为LEED的未来版本提供了一些建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号