首页> 外文会议>International conference on pipelines and trenchless technology >The Performance Compared Research of 75 diameter impregnated diamond core bit between Chinese and foreign
【24h】

The Performance Compared Research of 75 diameter impregnated diamond core bit between Chinese and foreign

机译:中外75直径浸渍金刚石核心位的性能比较研究

获取原文

摘要

There are two commonly methods to manufacture impregnated diamond bits at present: hot-pressing and the non-pressure immersion method. In order to test the performance of China impregnated diamond bit by hot pressing method and Ukraine bit with AKTM embedding in the lip surface by non-pressure immersion method, two types of drill bits were tested by the indoor bench drilling experiment and in geological core drilling located Jibaomiao mining area, using the same drilling parameters and the same granite fonnation which drillability was up to level 9.Test results showed that, the average mechanical penetration rate of China bit was 4.76 m/h when Ukrainian was 1.66 m/h; the average life time of China bit was 56.31m when Ukrainian was 25.38m. This paper analyzes the failure reasons of the two types of bits from the manufacturing technique and structure design. The research of this paper contributed to the design and manufacture of small-bore impregnated diamond bits.
机译:目前有两种通常制造浸渍金刚石比特的方法:热压和非压力浸渍法。为了通过非压力浸法方法通过热压方法和乌克兰嵌入唇部嵌入唇部嵌入唇部表面的浸渍方法的性能,通过室内台式钻探实验和地质核心钻井测试两种类型的钻头位于Jibaomiao采矿区,使用相同的钻孔参数和相同的花岗岩断线,可钻取达到9级最低的结果表明,当乌克兰为1.66米/小时,中国钻头的平均机械渗透率为4.76米/小时;乌克兰队的平均寿命为56.31米,乌克兰为25.38亿。本文分析了制造技术和结构设计两种类型的故障原因。本文的研究有助于设计和制造小孔浸渍金刚石比特。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号