首页> 外文会议>ISSMGE Technical Committee TC 211 international symposium on ground improvement >A comparison of soil improvement achieved using different vibro methods
【24h】

A comparison of soil improvement achieved using different vibro methods

机译:使用不同的振动方法进行土壤改良的比较

获取原文

摘要

A liquefied natural gas (LNG) plant is currently being constructed on a hydraulic fill in El Musel Port (Gijon, Northern Spain). The hydraulic fill is mainly composed of marine sands dredged from nearby locations, and it was placed on site using the rainbow and pipeline discharge and the bottom dump methods. The dynamic loads imposed by some of the plant elements suggested the need to conduct soil improvement using vibro-methods. To identify the most suitable method among those available, several options (including vibro compaction, and vibro-substitution using the bottom and top feed methods) were considered in a trial field. Monitoring and control methods included the use of geophysical methods as well as DPSH and SCPTU tests. This paper presents the results of the monitoring conducted at such trial field before and after the different treatments were employed, and it illustrates the degrees of improvement achived using each one.
机译:目前,在El Musel港口(西班牙北部希洪)的液压填充物上建设液化天然气(LNG)厂。水力填充物主要由附近地点挖出的海沙组成,并使用彩虹和管道排放以及底部倾倒方法将其放置在现场。一些植物元素施加的动态载荷表明需要使用振动法进行土壤改良。为了在可用的方法中确定最合适的方法,在试验领域中考虑了几种选择(包括振动压实以及使用底部和顶部进料方法进行振动替代)。监视和控制方法包括使用地球物理方法以及DPSH和SCPTU测试。本文介绍了在采用不同处理方法之前和之后在该试验场进行的监测结果,并说明了每种方法所获得的改进程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号