首页> 外文会议>ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work >Tweeting is Believing? Understanding Microblog Credibility Perceptions
【24h】

Tweeting is Believing? Understanding Microblog Credibility Perceptions

机译:鸣叫是相信吗?了解微博可信度认知

获取原文

摘要

Twitter is now used to distribute substantive content such as breaking news, increasing the importance of assessing the credibility of tweets. As users increasingly access tweets through search, they have less information on which to base credibility judgments as compared to consuming content from direct social network connections. We present survey results regarding users' perceptions of tweet credibility. We find a disparity between features users consider relevant to credibility assessment and those currently revealed by search engines. We then conducted two experiments in which we systematically manipulated several features of tweets to assess their impact on credibility ratings. We show that users are poor judges of truthfulness based on content alone, and instead are influenced by heuristics such as user name when making credibility assessments. Based on these findings, we discuss strategies tweet authors can use to enhance their credibility with readers (and strategies astute readers should be aware of!). We propose design improvements for displaying social search results so as to better convey credibility.
机译:Twitter现在用于分发实质性内容,例如突发新闻,从而提高了评估推文可信度的重要性。随着用户越来越多地通过搜索访问推文,与从直接社交网络连接中消费内容相比,他们所依据的信誉判断信息越来越少。我们提供有关用户对推特信誉的看法的调查结果。我们发现用户认为与信誉评估相关的功能与搜索引擎当前揭示的功能之间存在差异。然后,我们进行了两个实验,其中我们系统地操纵了推文的几个功能,以评估推文对信誉等级的影响。我们证明,仅凭内容,用户对真实性的判断就很差,而在进行可信度评估时,用户会受到试探法(例如用户名)的影响。基于这些发现,我们讨论了推文作者可以用来提高其在读者中的信誉的策略(以及精明的读者应注意的策略!)。我们建议对显示社交搜索结果的设计进行改进,以更好地传达信誉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号