首页> 外文会议>International conference on information systems;ICIS 2011 >Online Retailer vs. Click and Mortar Retailer: Who Performs Better?
【24h】

Online Retailer vs. Click and Mortar Retailer: Who Performs Better?

机译:在线零售商与点击和迫击炮零售商:谁的表现更好?

获取原文

摘要

Retail business is characterized by different business models: pure-play model and dual channel approach, which uses both physical and online channels to reach customers. There is conflicting evidence regarding the relative value of these business models to the consumers. We take a market valuation approach to evaluate the relative merits of both business models. We consider a panel of publicly traded US retailers and evaluate how their sales performance impacts their Tobin's q. We find that the dual channel retailers receive a market premium for their sales revenue as compared to the pure-play retailers. This higher valuation can be associated with higher customer satisfaction with dual channel firms leading to a higher intangible value as compared to the pure-play firms. Our results have important implications for retailers as we demonstrate the value of different channels. Our work also contributes to the existing literature on online consumer retailing and multichannel research.
机译:零售业务的特征在于不同的业务模型:纯业务模型和双渠道方法,该方法同时使用实体和在线渠道来吸引客户。关于这些商业模式对消费者的相对价值,有相互矛盾的证据。我们采用市场评估方法来评估这两种业务模型的相对优势。我们考虑一个由美国公开交易的零售商组成的小组,并评估他们的销售业绩如何影响其Tobin's q。我们发现,与纯零售商相比,双渠道零售商的销售收入获得了市场溢价。与纯业务公司相比,双通道公司的较高估值可以与更高的客户满意度相关联,从而导致更高的无形价值。当我们展示不同渠道的价值时,我们的结果对零售商具有重要意义。我们的工作还为有关在线消费者零售和多渠道研究的现有文献做出了贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号