首页> 外文会议>The Proceedings of 2011 International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Electronic Voting Systems >A modular multi-modal specification of real-timed, end-to-end voter-verifiable voting systems
【24h】

A modular multi-modal specification of real-timed, end-to-end voter-verifiable voting systems

机译:实时,端到端选民可验证投票系统的模块化多模式规范

获取原文

摘要

We propose a modular multi-modal specification of real-timed, end-to-end voter-verifiable voting systems, i.e., a formal but intuitive specification of real-timed voting systems that are accountable (and thus trustworthy) to their users. Our specification is expressed as a single but well-compounded formula in a logical language of temporal, epistemic, and provability modalities. The intuitiveness of the specification is the fruit of its modular and multi-modal form. This means that the specification can be appreciated compound-wise, as a logical conjunction of separate sub-requirements, each of which achieving the ideal of a formal transcription of a suitable natural-language formulation, thanks to powerful descriptive idioms in the form of our multiple modalities. The modular form reduces our proof of the satisfiability (consistency) and thus implementability of the specification to a proof by inspection, and induces the parallelisability of implementation-correctness verifications. The specification also pinpoints the implementation-specific part of particular voting systems, reuses a generic definition of accountability inducing trust in a formal sense, and, last but not least, counter-balances by its implementability some previous results about the contradictory conjunction of certain desirable property pairs of voting systems. So in some sense, ideal voting systems do exist. Our specific formalisation principles are agent correctness, i.e., the behavioural correctness of the voting-system-constituting agents, and data adequacy, i.e., the soundness and (relative) completeness of the voting data processed by the system.
机译:我们提出了实时的,端对端的可验证投票系统的模块化多模式规范,即对用户负责(从而值得信赖)的实时投票系统的正式但直观的规范。我们的规范以时间,认知和可证明性方式的逻辑语言表示为一个单一但复杂的公式。规范的直观性是其模块化和多模式形式的成果。这意味着该规范可以作为单独的子要求的逻辑结合进行复合理解,由于我们形式的强大描述性习语,每个子要求都实现了合适的自然语言表达形式的正式抄写的理想选择多种方式。模块化的形式减少了我们对可满足性(一致性)的证明,从而降低了规范对检查的证明的可实施性,并导致了实现正确性验证的可并行性。该规范还指出了特定表决系统的特定于实现的部分,重用了形式上正式意义上的问责制诱导信任的定义,最后但并非最不重要的一点是,通过其可实现性来抵消一些有关某些期望的矛盾结合的先前结果。属性对投票系统。因此从某种意义上说,确实存在理想的投票系统。我们具体的形式化原则是座席正确性,即构成投票系统的座席的行为正确性,以及数据充分性,即系统处理的投票数据的健全性和(相对)完整性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号