首页> 外文会议>SIREN;Italian workshop on neural nets;Annual meeting of the Italian Neural Network Society >ICA based Algorithms for Flaw Classification in Pulsed Eddy Current Data: A Study
【24h】

ICA based Algorithms for Flaw Classification in Pulsed Eddy Current Data: A Study

机译:基于ICA的脉冲涡流数据缺陷分类算法研究

获取原文

摘要

Pulsed Eddy Current (PEC) is a new emerging Non Destructive Evaluation technique for sub-surface defect detection. It provides new challenges to signal analysis and interpretation approach applied to the inspection evaluation. For instance, PEC could suffer from noise and be not sufficient to extract more information about the defects. This paper aims to approach the challenge of flaw identification in PECs. Due to non-Gaussianity of PEC measurements, we applied Independent Component Analysis (ICA) in extracting information from PEC responses. We considered three different approaches implementing ICA, in order to project the response signals of various defects into the Independent Components (ICs) feature space. Then, useful ICs of each algorithm were used as features for machine learning algorithms, in order to solve the inverse problem of pattern classification. Since the nongaussianity of the OEC measurements, we retained ICs with highest kurtosis. The considered different kinds of defects were: metal loss, sub-surface cracks, surface defects and slants. We compared the performances of our implemented algorithms with results available in scientific literature. We obtained improvements in reliability of the pattern classification algorithm, as well as in reducing the computational load, obtaining a classification error of 8.54% over 3063 testing patterns.
机译:脉冲涡流(PEC)是一种新兴的外表面缺陷检测的非破坏性评估技术。它为信号分析和应用于检查评估的解释方法提供了新的挑战。例如,PEC可能遭受噪声,并且不足以提取有关缺陷的更多信息。本文旨在探讨PECS缺陷鉴定的挑战。由于PEC测量的非高斯度,我们应用了独立的分量分析(ICA)从PEC响应中提取信息。我们考虑了三种不同的方法实施ICA,以便将各种缺陷的响应信号投影到独立组件(ICS)特征空间中。然后,每种算法的有用IC被用作机器学习算法的特征,以解决模式分类的逆问题。自从OEC测量的非奥斯人以来,我们保留了最高峰氏的IC。被认为是不同种类的缺陷是:金属损耗,子表面裂缝,表面缺陷和倾斜。我们将我们实施的算法的表演与科学文献中的结果进行了比较。我们获得了改进了模式分类算法的可靠性,以及减少计算负载,获得超过3063个测试模式的分类误差为8.54%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号