首页> 外文会议>International conference on human-computer interaction;Symposium on human interface;HCI international 2011 >Flight Deck Workload and Acceptability of Verbal and Digital Communication Protocols
【24h】

Flight Deck Workload and Acceptability of Verbal and Digital Communication Protocols

机译:飞行甲板的工作量以及口头和数字通信协议的可接受性

获取原文

摘要

The Federal Aviation Administration hopes to convert air traffic management to Trajectory Based Operations (TBO), under which aircraft flight plans are known to computer systems which aid in scheduling and separation. However, few aircraft flying today have equipment designed to support TBO. We conducted a human-in-the-loop simulation of TBO using current fleet equipage. Three aircraft equipage levels were explored: Voice (the equipment currently used), FANS (the Future Aircraft Navigation System datacom designed for use in TBO), and ACARS (a datacom system widely used for communication with Airline Operation Centers). FANS uplinked flight plans can be automatically loaded into the Flight Management System, while ACARS delivers text that must be entered manually. Pilots rated various aspects of the procedures. Voice was preferred to FANS, with ACARS rated worst, apparently because of slow response times for requests with datacom. Using a mixture of Voice and datacom may provide the benefits of both.
机译:美国联邦航空管理局希望将空中交通管理转换为基于轨迹的运营(TBO),根据该运营,计算机系统可以了解飞机的飞行计划,以帮助进行计划和分离。但是,今天飞行的飞机很少有支持TBO的设备。我们使用当前的机队装备对TBO进行了人为模拟。探讨了三个飞机设备级别:语音(当前使用的设备),FANS(设计用于TBO的未来飞机导航系统数据通信)和ACARS(广泛用于与航空公司运营中心进行通信的数据通信系统)。可以将FANS上行链路的飞行计划自动加载到飞行管理系统中,而ACARS则提供必须手动输入的文本。飞行员对程序的各个方面进行了评分。语音优于FANS,ACARS评级最差,这显然是因为对数据通信请求的响应时间较慢。混合使用语音和数据通信可能会提供两者的好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号