首页> 外文会议>World conference on timber engineering;WCTE 2010 >GROWTH AREAS IN EUROPE WITH REGARD TO DIFFERENT WOOD SPECIES AND GRADING PRINCIPLES
【24h】

GROWTH AREAS IN EUROPE WITH REGARD TO DIFFERENT WOOD SPECIES AND GRADING PRINCIPLES

机译:欧洲不同木材种类和等级原则的生长地区

获取原文

摘要

Common aim of the European joint-project "Gradewood - Grading of timber for engineered wood products" is to improve applicability of machine strength grading. Using efficient grading machines leads to higher reliability of timber used for civil engineering while making an optimal use of the available raw material. The spreading of new grading technologies across Europe is retarded due to current standards used for the evaluation of new grading systems placed on the market. One major problem are the requirements for allowing single machines to grade timber from new source countries. This causes a lot of expensive testing for machine manufacturers as large amounts of tested timber pieces are required for every single country. Whether the same settings for different countries in Europe can be used is checked by analyzing old data and by testing timber from areas where data is missing. In a first step Already existing strength data available at six European research institutes was analyzed [1]. Several thousand datasets were evaluated separately for different species and load modes. Available laboratory data was used in 14 different linear regression models using the strength as a target value, in order to simulate machine strength grading. Results in different strength classes were simulated by analysing the test data separately for different bandwidths. The assignment to the different bandwidths was based on the calculated model values. Even though all characteristic values were considered in the analysis of the existing data, the main attention was given to the strength values. Confidence limits were derived. It was assumed that if the characteristic strength values for single countries reach values which lie between the upper and the lower confidence limit, the timber can be graded with the same model and the samesettings. For the different species and loading modes the analysis of existing data showed the following results. For bending of spruce, the use of the same model using common settings for timber from Central and Northern Europe is not possible. The situation for spruce loaded in tension is different. Several models can be used for timber from Northern Europe and Central Europe at the same time. Results for bending of pine showed more variability. Settings need to be derived separately for different countries in order to have good and safe grading results. Due to the lack of test results for bending of pine, no hard conclusion could be drawn. The goal of the article is to judge the first results of more than 5000 additional tests of timber from different parts of Europe. The question is whether the models derived on a Central and North European datasets can be used for timber from Eastern Europe. Which results can be reached in the different bandwidths compared to the already available strength values and what is the effect on the yield. Different models are considered. Different research institutes have performed bending and tension tests on 5066 specimens (Table 1).
机译:欧洲联合项目“ Gradewood-工程木产品用木材的分级”的共同目标是提高机器强度分级的适用性。使用高效的分级机可提高土木工程用木材的可靠性,同时最佳地利用可用的原材料。由于目前用于评估投放市场的新分级系统的标准,新分级技术在欧洲的普及受到阻碍。一个主要问题是允许单台机器对来自新来源国的木材进行分级的要求。这给机器制造商带来了许多昂贵的测试,因为每个国家/地区都需要大量的经过测试的木材。通过分析旧数据并通过测试缺少数据的区域的木材来检查是否可以为欧洲不同国家使用相同的设置。第一步,分析了六个欧洲研究机构的现有强度数据[1]。分别评估了数千个数据集的不同种类和负载模式。为了模拟机器强度等级,将可用的实验室数据以强度为目标值用于14种不同的线性回归模型中。通过分别分析不同带宽的测试数据来模拟不同强度等级的结果。根据计算出的模型值分配给不同的带宽。即使在分析现有数据时考虑了所有特征值,也主要关注强度值。得出置信限。假定如果单个国家的特征强度值达到介于置信上限和下限之间的值,则可以使用相同的模型和相同的设置对木材进行分级。对于不同的物种和加载方式,现有数据分析显示以下结果。对于云杉的弯曲,不能使用来自中欧和北欧木材的通用设置的相同模型。云杉承受张力的情况有所不同。几种型号可以同时用于北欧和中欧的木材。松木弯曲的结果显示出更大的可变性。需要分别导出不同国家/地区的设置,以便获得良好且安全的评分结果。由于缺乏弯曲松木的测试结果,因此无法得出确切的结论。本文的目的是判断来自欧洲不同地区的5000多次木材附加测试的初步结果。问题是从中欧和北欧数据集导出的模型是否可用于东欧的木材。与已经可用的强度值相比,可以在不同的带宽中获得哪些结果,这对产量有什么影响。考虑不同的模型。不同的研究机构对5066个样品进行了弯曲和拉伸测试(表1)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号