首页> 外文会议>47th annual rocky mountain bioengineering symposium 47th international ISA biomedical sciences instrumentation symposium 2010 >Terminal Digit Bias Is Not An Issue For Properly Trained Healthcare Personnel Using Manual or Semi-Automated Devices
【24h】

Terminal Digit Bias Is Not An Issue For Properly Trained Healthcare Personnel Using Manual or Semi-Automated Devices

机译:对于使用手动或半自动设备进行过适当培训的医护人员,终端数字偏差不是问题

获取原文

摘要

The objective of this study was to evaluate terminal digit preference in blood pressure (BP) measurements taken from a sample of clinics at a large academic health sciences center. We hypothesized that terminal digit preference would occur more frequently in BP measurements taken with manual mercury sphygmomanometry compared to those obtained with semi-automated instruments. A total of 1,393 BP measures were obtained in 16 ambulatory and inpatient sites by personnel using both mercury (n= 1,286) and semi-automated (n=107) devices For the semi-automated devices, a trained observer repeated the patient's BP following American Heart Association recommendations using a similar device with a known calibration history. At least two recorded systolic and diastolic blood pressures (average of two or more readings for each) were obtained for all manual mercury readings. Data were evaluated using descriptive statistics and Chi square as appropriate (SPSS software, 17.0). Overall, zero and other terminal digit preference was observed more frequently in systolic (X~2 = 883.21, df = 9, p < 0.001) and diastolic readings (X~2 = 1076.77, df = 9, p < 0.001) from manual instruments, while all end digits obtained by clinic staff using semi-automated devices were more evenly distributed (X~2 = 8.23, df = 9, p = 0.511 for systolic and X~2 = 10.48, df = 9, p = 0.313 for diastolic). In addition to zero digit bias in mercury readings, even numbers were reported with significantly higher frequency than odd numbers. There was no detectable digit preference observed when examining semi-automated measurements by clinic staff or device type for either systolic or diastolic BP measures. These findings demonstrate that terminal digit preference was more likely to occur with manual mercury sphygmomanometry. This phenomenon was most likely the result of mercury column graduation in 2 mm Hg increments producing a higher than expected frequency of even digits.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估从大型学术健康科学中心的诊所样本中获得的血压(BP)测量结果的最终数字偏爱。我们假设与半自动仪器获得的血压相比,在手动水银血压计进行的BP测量中,终端数字偏好发生的频率更高。工作人员使用汞(n = 1,286)和半自动(n = 107)装置在16个门诊和住院部位获得了1,393项BP测量值。对于半自动装置,由受过训练的观察者按照American进行重复患者的BP测量。心脏协会建议使用具有已知校准历史的类似设备。对于所有手动汞读数,至少获得了两个记录的收缩压和舒张压(每个血压的平均读数为两个或多个)。使用描述性统计量和适当的卡方值(SPSS软件,17.0)评估数据。总体而言,手动器械的收缩压(X〜2 = 883.21,df = 9,p <0.001)和舒张压读数(X〜2 = 1076.77,df = 9,p <0.001)观察到零和其他终末位数字偏好更为频繁。 ,而诊所工作人员使用半自动装置获得的所有最终指位分布更均匀(收缩压的X〜2 = 8.23,df = 9,p = 0.511,舒张压的X〜2 = 10.48,df = 9,p = 0.313 )。除了汞读数的零位偏差外,偶数的频率要比奇数的频率高得多。当检查临床人员或设备类型的半自动测量值是否为收缩压或舒张压测量值时,没有发现可检测到的数字偏爱。这些发现表明,手动水银血压计更容易出现终端数字偏爱。这种现象很可能是汞柱以2 mm Hg增量分度的结果,产生了比预期的偶数位数更高的频率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号