首页> 外文会议>2010 Proceedings of Technology Management for Global Economic Growth >Innovation profiles of outstanding companies in Taiwan: An open innovation perspective
【24h】

Innovation profiles of outstanding companies in Taiwan: An open innovation perspective

机译:台湾杰出公司的创新概况:开放式创新视角

获取原文

摘要

Community Innovation Surveys (CIS) have been widely used in recent years to study open innovation (OI) activities, which have become a hot issue. While most research has aimed for a general overview of the OI activities in a specific country, this study, which pertains to OI activities in Taiwan, focuses on outstandingly innovative firms to benchmark and examine country-specific industrial characteristics, from which implications for innovation policies can be derived. Several findings emerge from our survey. First, Taiwan's outstanding firms have the best scores in regard to search breadth and depth dimensions, which indicate that in a small and export-oriented economy, these firms emphasize diverse information sources. A comparison of breadth and depth dimensions shows that they perform significantly better in the former than in the latter. Second, an analysis of the different categories of firms shows that manufacturing, SMEs and award-winners have more aggressive OI strategies than do service, large and non-award winners. Third, with respect to R&D factors, external innovation breadth is negatively correlated with R&D intensity, whereas depth indicators have a higher explanatory ability in regard to R&D expenditure. Finally, with respect to innovative performance, again external innovation depth is the main driver of the financial performance of companies. The implications for innovation policies are discussed.
机译:近年来,社区创新调查(CIS)已广泛用于研究开放式创新(OI)活动,这已成为热门问题。尽管大多数研究旨在对特定国家/地区的OI活动进行总体概述,但该研究与台湾的OI活动有关,侧重于杰出的创新型公司,以对标和考察特定国家/地区的产业特征,从而对创新政策产生影响可以得出。我们的调查得出了一些发现。首先,台湾优秀企业在搜索范围和深度维度上得分最高,这表明在规模较小且以出口为导向的经济中,这些企业强调多种信息来源。宽度和深度尺寸的比较显示,它们在前者中的表现明显好于后者。其次,对不同类别公司的分析表明,制造业,中小企业和获奖企业比服务业,大型企业和非获奖企业拥有更积极的OI策略。第三,就R&D要素而言,外部创新广度与R&D强度呈负相关,而深度指标在R&D支出方面具有较高的解释能力。最后,关于创新绩效,外部创新深度也是公司财务绩效的主要驱动力。讨论了创新政策的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号