首页> 外文会议>2010 Computers in Cardiology >Development and comparison of single-parameter indices characterizing severity of acute myocardial ischemia
【24h】

Development and comparison of single-parameter indices characterizing severity of acute myocardial ischemia

机译:急性心肌缺血严重程度的单参数指标的建立和比较

获取原文

摘要

Our aim was to assess the sensitivity/specificity of 2 indices of ischemia severity (Σ|ST| and STRMS) for 5 triplets of leads: X, Y, Z; V2, V5, aVF; V2, V5, III; V3, V5, III; and V3, V6, III, each derived from 7 subsets of Mason-Likar 12-lead ECG with limb leads and dual precordial leads (V1, V3; V1, V4; V1, V5; V2, V4; V2, V5; V3, V5; V3, V6). Coefficients for deriving lead triplets were developed from the design set (n = 892). The test set comprised 12-lead ECGs (n = 99) acquired before and during ischemia induced by balloon-inflation angioplasty. We compared the ability of tested indices to detect ischemia by constructing their receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) and measuring a percentage area under the entire ROC curve (AUC) and in specificity range 0.8-0.9 (AUC0.8-0.9). The mean performance for 7 predictor sets in terms of AUC (%) for Σ|ST|/STRMS was: 88.4/88.8 for X, Y, Z; 88.6/86.5 for V2, V5, aVF; 89.4/87.5 for V2, V5, III; 90.4/90.3 for V3, V5, III; and 90.5/90.2 for V3, V6, III. Mean values of AUC0.8-0.9 (%) for Σ|ST|/STRMS were: 78.1/80.5 for X, Y, Z; 80.7/71.6 for V2, V5, aVF; 77.6/74.5 for V2, V5, III; 77.7/80.8 for V3, V5, III; and 85.7/82.4 for V3, V6, III. Thus we conclude that the currently used indices using “pseudo-orthogonal” leads V2, V5, aVF, and orthogonal leads X, Y, Z performed in ischemia detection nearly as the best indices based on V3, V6, III. These results should be corroborated on a larger study population.
机译:我们的目的是评估5个三联征的两个缺血严重程度指标(Σ| ST |和ST RMS )的敏感性/特异性。 V2,V5,aVF; V2,V5,III; V3,V5,III;和V3,V6,III,每个均来自Mason-Likar 12导联心电图的7个子集,具有肢体导联和双心前导联(V1,V3,V1,V4,V1,V5,V2,V4,V2,V5,V3, V5; V3,V6)。从设计组中得出了导出三重态的系数(n = 892)。该测试集包括在气囊充气血管成形术诱导的缺血之前和之中获取的12导联心电图(n = 99)。我们比较了测试指标通过构建其受体工作特征(ROC)并测量整个ROC曲线(AUC)和特异性范围为0.8-0.9(AUC 0.8-0.9 )。对于Σ| ST | / ST RMS ,根据AUC(%)的7个预测变量集的平均性能为:X,Y,Z为88.4 / 88.8; V2,V5,aVF为88.6 / 86.5; V2,V5,III为89.4 / 87.5; V3,V5,III为90.4 / 90.3;对于V3,V6,III,则为90.5 / 90.2。 Σ| ST | / ST RMS 的AUC 0.8-0.9 (%)平均值为:X,Y,Z为78.1 / 80.5; V2,V5,aVF为80.7 / 71.6; V2,V5,III为77.6 / 74.5; V3,V5,III为77.7 / 80.8;对于V3,V6,III,则为85.7 / 82.4。因此,我们得出结论,在缺血检测中,当前使用的使用“伪正交”引线V2,V5,aVF和正交引线X,Y,Z的索引几乎是基于V3,V6,III的最佳索引。这些结果应在更大的研究人群中得到证实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号