首页> 外文会议>Conference on Adaptive Optics Systems >On-sky MOAO performance evaluation of RAVEN
【24h】

On-sky MOAO performance evaluation of RAVEN

机译:乌鸦的天空穆奥绩效评估

获取原文

摘要

This paper presents the AO performance we got on-sky with RAVEN, a Multi-Object Adaptive Optics (MOAO) technical and science demonstrator installed and tested at the Subaru telescope. We report Ensquared-Energy (EE) and Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) measured from science images on Subaru's IRCS taken during all of the on-sky observing runs. We show these metrics as function of different AO modes and atmospheric conditions for two asterisms of natural guide stars. The performances of the MOAO and Ground-Layer AO (GLAO) modes are between the classical Single-Conjugate AO (SCAO) and seeing-limited modes. We achieve the EE of 30% in H-band with the MOAO correction, which is a science requirement for RAVEN. The MOAO provides sightly better performance than the GLAO mode in both asterisms. One of the reasons which cause this small difference between the MOAO and GLAO modes may be the strong GL contribution. Also, the performance of the MOAO modes is affected by the accuracy of the on-sky turbulence profiling by the SLOpe Detection And Ranging (SLODAR) method.
机译:本文提出了我们与乌鸦的AO性能,一个多目标自适应光学(Moao)技术和科学示范器安装和在斯巴鲁望远镜测试。我们向在所有在天空观测运行中拍摄的Subaru的IRC中,从科学映射中报告了Ensquared-Energy(EE)和全宽度的全部宽度。我们将这些指标显示为不同AO模式和大气条件的功能,为自然导灯的两个间距。 MoAO和地层AO(glao)模式的性能在经典的单缀合物AO(SCAO)之间并看到有限的模式。我们在HOOA修正中实现了H-Band的ee 30%,这是乌鸦的科学要求。莫岛提供比两种间谍中的Glao模式更好的表现。导致MoAO和Glao模式之间这种小差异的原因之一可能是强大的GL贡献。此外,MoAO模式的性能受到边坡检测和测距(SLODAR)方法的天空湍流分析的准确性的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号