首页> 外文会议>第21届国际摄影测量与遥感大会(ISPRS 2008)论文集 >A COMPARISON OF BAYESIAN AND EVIDENCE-BASED FUSION METHODS FOR AUTOMATED BUILDING DETECTION IN AERIAL DATA
【24h】

A COMPARISON OF BAYESIAN AND EVIDENCE-BASED FUSION METHODS FOR AUTOMATED BUILDING DETECTION IN AERIAL DATA

机译:贝叶斯与证据融合方法在航空数据自动检测中的比较

获取原文

摘要

Automated approaches to building detection are of great importance in a number of different applications including map updating and monitoring of informal settlements. With the availability of multi-source aerial data in recent years, data fusion approaches to automated building detection have become more popular. In this paper, two data fusion methods, namely Bayesian and Dempster-Shafer, are evaluated for the detection of buildings in aerial image and laser range data, and their performances are compared. The results indicate that the Bayesian maximum likelihood method yields a higher detection rate, while the Dempster-Shafer method results in a lower false-positive rate. A comparison of the results in pixel level and object level reveals that both methods perform slightly better in object level.
机译:自动化的建筑物检测方法在许多不同的应用中都非常重要,包括地图更新和非正式住区监测。近年来,随着多源航空数据的可用性,用于自动建筑物检测的数据融合方法变得越来越流行。本文对贝叶斯和Dempster-Shafer两种数据融合方法进行了评估,以用于航空图像和激光测距数据中的建筑物检测,并比较了它们的性能。结果表明,贝叶斯最大似然方法产生较高的检测率,而Dempster-Shafer方法产生较低的假阳性率。对像素级别和对象级别的结果进行比较后发现,这两种方法在对象级别上的表现都稍好一些。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号