【24h】

Univariate vs. Multivariate Moving Window Spectral Analysis

机译:单变量与多变量移动窗口光谱分析

获取原文

摘要

The Univariate Moving Window Spectral method of time series analysis is compared with its Multivariate Moving Window Spectral Method (MWS) counterpart. We consider a tri-variate sales, price and income data set for an electrical energy market. The particular time period is for 1936 to 1978. This period is of interest because it includes 1972, the year in which the price of oil and its dependent price of electricity underwent a turning point from a downward annual trend to and upward annual trend. One might speculate that this change is due to a structural break. In this case, such a structural break may be due to a policy decision arising out of the formation of an oil cartel. Both the Univariate and Multivariate Moving Window Spectral methods forecast the turning point, suggesting that the turning point is due to the market economic forces and a better specification of the model by the Moving Spectral Method. In addition to the foregoing observations, we observe that the Multivariate MWS method produces smaller mean absolute percentage error forecasts.
机译:将时间序列分析的单变量移动窗口谱法与其多变量移动窗口谱法(MWS)对应进行比较。我们考虑为电气能源市场进行三​​变量的销售,价格和收入数据。特定的时间段是1936年至1978年。这一时期是令人兴趣的,因为它包括1972年,其中石油价格的年度和电力依赖性的年度接受了从下行年度趋势和向上趋势的转折点。人们可能会推测这种变化是由于结构突破。在这种情况下,这种结构突破可能是由于策略决定出来的油画。单变量和多变量移动窗口光谱方法预测转折点,表明转折点是由于市场经济力量和通过移动光谱法对模型的更好规范。除了上述观察外,我们还观察到多元MWS方法产生较小的平均绝对百分比误差预测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号