首页> 外文会议>Canadian Society for Civil Engineering annual conference >COMPARISON OF LABORATORY PERFORMANCE TESTS USED TO ASSESS ALKALI-SILICA REACTIVITY
【24h】

COMPARISON OF LABORATORY PERFORMANCE TESTS USED TO ASSESS ALKALI-SILICA REACTIVITY

机译:用于评估碱性二氧化硅反应性的实验室性能试验的比较

获取原文

摘要

Alkali-silica reaction of certain concrete aggregates can lead to premature deterioration and maintenance problems in concrete structures. The CSA A23.1-14 A/ASTM C1293 concrete prism test (CPT) and the CSA A23.2-25A/ASTM C1260/ASTM C1567 accelerated mortar bar test (AMBT) are the two main procedures used in CSA and ASTM standards for examining the potential alkali-silica reactivity (ASR) of aggregates and also for assessing the effectiveness of supplementary cementing materials (SCMs) in suppressing ASR. The long testing duration of the CPT and the unreliability of the rapid AMBT have led to development and evaluation of a third method, the accelerated concrete prism test (ACPT). All three methods were performed using a range of different aggregates and SCM partial replacements of cement. Expansion data were compared with one another and with known field performance, where available. Results show good correlation between CPT and ACPT expansions and these tests appear to be good predictors of field performance. The AMBT, on the other hand, can be very misleading with certain aggregates.
机译:某些混凝土聚集体的碱二氧化硅反应可导致混凝土结构的过早恶化和维护问题。 CSA A23.1-14 A / ASTM C1293混凝土棱镜试验(CPT)和CSA A23.2-25A / ASTM C1260 / ASTM C1567加速砂浆测试(AMBT)是CSA和ASTM标准中使用的两种主要程序检查聚集体的潜在碱 - 二氧化硅反应性(ASR),还用于评估补充胶合材料(SCM)在抑制ASR中的有效性。 CPT的长期测试持续时间和快速AMBT的不可靠性导致了第三种方法的开发和评估,加速混凝土棱镜试验(ACPT)。所有三种方法都是使用一系列不同的聚集体和SCM部分替代水泥进行。扩展数据彼此进行比较,并具有已知的现场性能,可用。结果表明CPT与ACPT膨胀之间的良好相关性,这些测试似乎是良好的现场性能预测因子。另一方面,AMBT可以与某些聚集体非常误导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号