【24h】

Comparsion of different microwave radiometric calibration techniques

机译:比较不同的微波辐射校准技术

获取原文

摘要

We compare three techniques typically used for calibrating a microwave radiometer and understanding its design stability. The first calibration technique utilizes cold and hot load measurements to construct calibration curves. For our case, we used sky as the cold load and microwave absorber at ambient temperature as hot load. The second calibration technique utilizes measurements of the brightness temperature of the sky at various zenith angles to determine the atmospheric opacity needed for the calibration curves. The third calibration technique utilizes measurements of internal reference load and micro-controller inside the radiometer at both polarizations to estimate the system gain fluctuations and the receiver noise temperatures. We calibrated our University of Florida C-band Microwave Radiometer (UFCMR) every two weeks during the first Microwave Water and Energy Balance Experiment (MicroWEX-1). We found that, the first and third techniques produced similar calibration results with 1 Kelvin/volt standard deviation. However, the third technique was the most stable during the entire experiment with the smallest standard deviations which were 2.41 Kelvin/volt for the slope of the calibration curves at H-pol and 7.46 Kelvin/volt for the slope of the calibration curves at V-pol during MicroWEX-1.
机译:我们比较了三种通常用于校准微波辐射计并了解其设计稳定性的技术。第一项校准技术利用冷负荷和热负荷测量来构建校准曲线。对于我们的情况,我们使用天空作为冷负荷,在环境温度下使用微波吸收器作为热负荷。第二种校准技术利用各种天顶角度的天空亮度温度的测量值来确定校准曲线所需的大气不透明度。第三种校准技术利用辐射计内部在两个极化方向上的内部基准负载和微控制器的测量值来估计系统增益波动和接收器噪声温度。在第一个微波水和能量平衡实验(MicroWEX-1)期间,我们每两周对佛罗里达大学C波段微波辐射计(UFCMR)进行一次校准。我们发现,第一种和第三种技术产生的校准结果相似,开尔文/伏特标准偏差为1。但是,第三种技术在整个实验中最稳定,标准偏差最小,对于H-pol处的校准曲线斜率为2.41开尔文/伏特,对于V-pol处的校准曲线斜率为7.46开尔文/伏特在MicroWEX-1期间执行pol。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号