首页> 外文会议>Safety and Reliability >Benchmark risk analysis models used in the Netherlands
【24h】

Benchmark risk analysis models used in the Netherlands

机译:荷兰使用的基准风险分析模型

获取原文

摘要

A benchmark exercise was initiated to compare five software tools available in the Netherlands for quantified risk analysis. The analysis was performed on a hypothetical establishment. The plant was chosen as to cover many of the scenario's that will be part of a real analysis such as the release of flammable and toxic clouds; liquids, gases and liquefied gases; vessels and pipes etc. Using each participating tool a complete risk analysis was performed. The participants were asked to perform a risk analysis according to the guidelines given in the so-called coloured books. These books give methods for calculating probabilities, consequences and effects. Also guidelines are set-up for performing a risk analysis. All participants had deviations due to the available software, arguments of practicality or matters of principle. The less the methodology for the calculation of the effects of certain scenario's is established the larger the differences that were found between the results. The results for all participants were found largely within one order of magnitude.
机译:启动了基准测试,以比较荷兰可用于量化风险分析的五种软件工具。该分析是在假设的场所进行的。选择该工厂是因为它涵盖了许多情景,这些情景将成为真实分析的一部分,例如可燃和有毒云的释放。液体,气体和液化气体;容器和管道等。使用每种参与工具进行了完整的风险分析。要求参与者根据所谓的有色书籍中给出的指南进行风险分析。这些书提供了计算概率,后果和影响的方法。还设置了进行风险分析的准则。由于可用软件,实用性或原则性问题,所有参与者均存在偏差。建立某些方案的影响的计算方法越少,结果之间的差异就越大。发现所有参与者的结果大致都在一个数量级之内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号