首页> 外文会议>Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation >A STUDY OF DRYING AND CLEANING METHODS USED IN PREPARATION FOR FLUORESCENT PENETRANT INSPECTION - PART Ⅱ
【24h】

A STUDY OF DRYING AND CLEANING METHODS USED IN PREPARATION FOR FLUORESCENT PENETRANT INSPECTION - PART Ⅱ

机译:用于荧光渗透检测的干燥清洗方法的研究-第二部分。

获取原文

摘要

Fluorescent penetrant inspection is the most widely used method for aerospace components such as critical rotating components of gas turbine engines. Successful use of FPI begins with a clean and dry part, followed by a carefully controlled and applied FPI process, and conscientious inspection by well trained personnel. A variety of cleaning methods are in use for cleaning of titanium and nickel parts with selection based on the soils or contamination to be removed. Cleaning methods may include chemical or mechanical methods with sixteen different types studied as part of this program. Several options also exist for use in drying parts prior to FPI. Samples were generated and exposed to a range of conditions to study the effect of both drying and cleaning methods on the flaw response of FPI. Low cycle fatigue (LCF) cracks were generated in approximately 40 nickel and 40 titanium samples for evaluation of the various cleaning methods. Baseline measurements were made for each of the samples using a photometer to measure sample brightness and a UVA videomicroscope to capture digital images of the FPI indications. Samples were exposed to various contaminants, cleaned and inspected. Brightness measurements and digital images were also taken to compare to the baseline data. A comparison of oven drying to flash dry in preparation for FPI has been completed and will be reported in Part Ⅰ. Comparison of the effectiveness of various cleaning methods for the contaminants will be presented in Part Ⅱ. The cleaning and drying studies were completed in cooperation with Delta Airlines using cleaning, drying and FPI processes typical of engine overhaul processes and equipment. The work was completed as part of the Engine Titanium Consortium and included investigators from Honeywell, General Electric, Pratt & Whitney, and Rolls Royce.
机译:荧光渗透检查是航空航天部件(例如燃气涡轮发动机的关键旋转部件)使用最广泛的方法。 FPI的成功使用始于清洁干燥的零件,然后是经过仔细控制和应用的FPI流程,并由训练有素的人员进行认真的检查。根据要去除的污物或污染物,可以选择多种清洁方法来清洁钛和镍零件。清洁方法可能包括化学或机械方法,该方法研究了十六种不同类型的方法。在FPI之前,还存在用于干燥零件的几种选择。生成样品并将其暴露于一系列条件下,以研究干燥和清洁方法对FPI缺陷响应的影响。在大约40个镍和40个钛样品中产生了低循环疲劳(LCF)裂纹,用于评估各种清洁方法。使用光度计测量样品亮度,并使用UVA显微镜观察FPI指示的数字图像,对每个样品进行基线测量。样品暴露于各种污染物,进行清洁和检查。还进行了亮度测量和数字图像以与基线数据进行比较。已经完成了烤箱干燥和闪蒸干燥以制备FPI的比较,并将在第一部分中进行报告。在第二部分中将比较各种清洁方法对污染物的有效性。清洁和干燥研究是与达美航空(Delta Airlines)合作完成的,其中使用了发动机大修过程和设备所特有的清洁,干燥和FPI过程。这项工作是作为发动机钛合金联合会的一部分完成的,其中包括霍尼韦尔,通用电气,普惠公司和劳斯莱斯公司的研究人员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号