首页> 外文会议>IAF 50th International Astronautical Congress 4-8 Oct 1999/Amsterdam, The Netherlands >A view to the future: trans-atlantic space firms and us-european industrial policy co-ordination
【24h】

A view to the future: trans-atlantic space firms and us-european industrial policy co-ordination

机译:对未来的展望:跨大西洋航天公司和美欧工业政策协调

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The aim of this paper is to show that co-ordination of the US and European industrial space policies to prevent collusion of the US and European firms and the opening up of the government-led space markets to Trans-Atlantic competitors will improve the efficiency of the respective space industries and welfare. To show this, different industrial structures are presented and compared with the use of relevant industrial economics models. First, the current industrial structure, where the US and tghe European space firms compete as duopolists in commercial space markets and face a monopoly in the domestic, government-led space market. Second, an industrial structure with opened-up to competition government-led space markets, and finally two more industrial structures representing the impact of collusion by the US and European space firms in the above cases. The comparison supports the hypothesis and points at clear implications for the US and European space policies, which assuming them lobby-free from their domestic space firms, should open-up their appropriate governmentled space markets and co-ordinate their policies to prevent collusion between the space firms.
机译:本文的目的是表明,协调美国和欧洲的工业空间政策以防止美国和欧洲公司的合谋以及政府主导的航天市场向跨大西洋竞争者的开放将提高核电厂的效率。各自的航天工业和福利。为了说明这一点,提出了不同的产业结构,并与相关的产业经济学模型进行了比较。首先,在当前的产业结构中,美国和欧洲的航天公司在商业航天市场中扮演着双重垄断者的角色,并在政府主导的国内航天市场中面临着垄断。第二,是开放给竞争性政府主导的航天市场的产业结构,最后是另外两个产业结构,代表了美国和欧洲航天公司在上述情况下的合谋影响。这种比较支持了这一假设,并指出了对美国和欧洲太空政策的明确含义,假设美国和欧洲太空政策不受其国内太空公司的游说,应开放其适当的政府主导的太空市场并协调其政策,以防止两者之间相互勾结。太空公司。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号