首页> 外文会议>Conference on mathematics and control in smart structures >Comparing direct model reference adaptive control with traditional feedback control in the area of damage mitigation
【24h】

Comparing direct model reference adaptive control with traditional feedback control in the area of damage mitigation

机译:在减轻损害方面将直接模型参考自适应控制与传统反馈控制进行比较

获取原文

摘要

Abstract: The incorporation of an active control system into an aerospace structure as part of a smart structure has raised the issue of: How does the controller respond when the structure is damaged? The answer is usually dependent on the answer to numerous other questions regarding the type of controller, the type of damage, the application of the smart structure, etc. However, previous research has indicated that the Direct Model Reference Adaptive Control (DMRAC) algorithm has potential in preventing the damaged smart structure from becoming unstable. Maintaining stability following an impact damage is of minimal usefulness if the controller can not also provide satisfactory performance before the damage event. This paper presents the simulation results of research comparing a velocity and position feedback controller with a DMRAC controller. The primary areas of concern were the undamaged performance (damping augmentation) and the damaged performance (stability and steady state response). The traditional controller design performed better before the damage occurred, but the DMRAC controller was significantly better after the damage occurred. !5
机译:摘要:将主动控制系统作为智能结构的一部分集成到航空航天结构中引发了以下问题:控制器在结构损坏时如何响应?答案通常取决于关于控制器类型,损坏类型,智能结构的应用等众多其他问题的答案。但是,先前的研究表明,直接模型参考自适应控制(DMRAC)算法具有以下优点:防止损坏的智能结构变得不稳定的潜力。如果控制器在损坏事件发生之前也无法提供令人满意的性能,则在冲击损坏后保持稳定性的作用将很小。本文介绍了将速度和位置反馈控制器与DMRAC控制器进行比较的研究仿真结果。关注的主要方面是性能未受损(阻尼增强)和性能受损(稳定性和稳态响应)。传统的控制器设计在损坏发生之前表现较好,但是DMRAC控制器在损坏发生之后明显更好。 !5

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号