首页> 外文会议>Conference on mathematics and control in smart structures >Comparing direct model reference adaptive control with traditional feedback control in the area of damage mitigation
【24h】

Comparing direct model reference adaptive control with traditional feedback control in the area of damage mitigation

机译:比较直接模型参考自适应控制与传统反馈控制在损伤区域中

获取原文

摘要

The incorporation of an active control system into an aerospace structure as part of a smart structure has raised the issue of: How does the controller respond when the structure is damaged? The answer is usually dependent on the answer to numerous other questions regarding the type of controller, the type of damage, the application of the smart structure, etc. However, previous research has indicated that the Direct Model Reference Adaptive Control (DMRAC) algorithm has potential in preventing the damaged smart structure from becoming unstable. Maintaining stability following an impact damage is of minimal usefulness if the controller can not also provide satisfactory performance before the damage event. This paper presents the simulation results of research comparing a velocity and position feedback controller with a DMRAC controller. The primary areas of concern were the undamaged performance (damping augmentation) and the damaged performance (stability and steady state response). The traditional controller design performed better before the damage occurred, but the DMRAC controller was significantly better after the damage occurred.
机译:作为智能结构的一部分,将主动控制系统纳入航空航天结构,提出了以下问题:控制器损坏时控制器如何响应?答案通常依赖于对控制器类型的许多其他问题的答案,损坏的类型,智能结构的应用等,但之前的研究表明,直接模型参考自适应控制(DMRAC)算法具有阻止损坏的智能结构变得不稳定的可能性。如果控制器在损坏事件前也不能提供令人满意的性能,则在冲击损坏后保持稳定性是最小的有用性。本文介绍了使用DMRAC控制器比较速度和位置反馈控制器的研究仿真结果。主要关注的主要领域是未遭受的性能(阻尼增强)和损坏的性能(稳定性和稳态响应)。在发生损坏之前,传统的控制器设计更好地执行,但在发生损坏后,DMRAC控制器明显更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号