首页> 外文会议>SPE/ISRM symposium on rock mechanics in petroleum engineering >A comparison of leak-off test and extended leak-off test data for stress estimation
【24h】

A comparison of leak-off test and extended leak-off test data for stress estimation

机译:对应力估计的泄漏测试和扩展泄漏测试数据的比较

获取原文

摘要

The principal function of leak-off tests is to assess casing integrity, but the test data are commonly used beyond this original purpose, for stress estimations in exploration and drilling. The value of leak-off test data for stress estimation is questionable and extended leak-off test data for stress estimation is questionable and extended leak-off tests have been proposed as a more appropriate method for stress estimation. The paper for the first time compares leak-off test (LOT) and extended leak-off test (ELOT) data from two areas, the North West Self of Australia and the Norwegian North Sea. Standard LOTs have a characteristically large scatter associated with the leak-off pressures (F_(lo), minimum stress and fracture gradient estimates in both areas. However, the minimum stress determined from ELOTs are consistent and from a lower bound to the standard P_(lo) data in both areas. The ELOT takes about an hour to perform, but provides far superior data than that obtained from a LOT, and is recommended where stress data are required.
机译:泄漏测试的主要功能是评估套管完整性,但测试数据通常用于超出这种原始目的,用于勘探和钻井的应力估算。用于应力估计的泄漏测试数据的值是可疑的,并且扩展了应力估计的泄漏测试数据是可疑的,并且已经提出了扩展的泄漏测试作为更合适的应力估计方法。本文首次比较了泄漏测试(批次)和延长了来自澳大利亚西北自我和挪威北海的两个地区的泄漏测试(elot)数据。标准批次具有与泄漏压力(F_(LO),两个区域中的最小应力和断裂梯度估计相关的特征性大的散点。然而,从当时确定的最小应力是一致的,并且从标准P_的下限LO)两个区域中的数据。ELOT需要大约一个小时的时间来执行,但提供比从批次获得的更优越的数据,并且建议在需要应力数据的地方。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号