首页> 外文会议>SPE/ISRM symposium on rock mechanics in petroleum engineering >A comparison of leak-off test and extended leak-off test data for stress estimation
【24h】

A comparison of leak-off test and extended leak-off test data for stress estimation

机译:比较泄漏测试和扩展泄漏测试数据以进行应力估计

获取原文

摘要

The principal function of leak-off tests is to assess casing integrity, but the test data are commonly used beyond this original purpose, for stress estimations in exploration and drilling. The value of leak-off test data for stress estimation is questionable and extended leak-off test data for stress estimation is questionable and extended leak-off tests have been proposed as a more appropriate method for stress estimation. The paper for the first time compares leak-off test (LOT) and extended leak-off test (ELOT) data from two areas, the North West Self of Australia and the Norwegian North Sea. Standard LOTs have a characteristically large scatter associated with the leak-off pressures (F_(lo), minimum stress and fracture gradient estimates in both areas. However, the minimum stress determined from ELOTs are consistent and from a lower bound to the standard P_(lo) data in both areas. The ELOT takes about an hour to perform, but provides far superior data than that obtained from a LOT, and is recommended where stress data are required.
机译:泄漏测试的主要功能是评估套管的完整性,但是测试数据通常超出此原始目的,用于勘探和钻探中的应力估算。用于应力估计的泄漏测试数据的值是可疑的,用于应力估计的扩展泄漏测试数据是可疑的,并且提出了扩展泄漏测试作为应力估计的更合适方法。该论文首次比较了来自澳大利亚西北西北地区和挪威北海两个地区的泄漏测试(LOT)和扩展泄漏测试(ELOT)数据。标准LOT的特征在于与泄漏压力(F_(lo),两个区域的最小应力和断裂梯度估计值)相关的特征性大分散。但是,从ELOT确定的最小应力是一致的,并且是从标准P_( Lo)在这两个区域中的数据ELOT大约需要一个小时才能执行,但是提供的数据要比从LOT获得的数据要好得多,因此建议在需要应力数据的地方使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号