首页> 外文会议>Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 1991. Proceedings., Annual >Field reliability versus predicted reliability: An analysis of root causes for the difference
【24h】

Field reliability versus predicted reliability: An analysis of root causes for the difference

机译:现场可靠性与预测可靠性:差异的根本原因分析

获取原文

摘要

Thirty-eight reliability experts from the US Department of Defense (DOD) and industry were asked to identify and rank order factors which potentially contributed to the difference between actual and predicted reliabilities (referred to as the reliability delta). Total quality management (TQM) tools were used to analyze the relationships among and impact of key variances on the reliability prediction process and explain apparent differences between the DOD and industry perspectives. The literature review identified eleven factors as possible causes of the reliability delta; however, only six were noted as being significant by the experts. The six factors identified were: problems with data collection; assumptions underlying and use of prediction techniques; lack of understanding of the operational environment; problems with manufacturing processes; short-term management focus; and design-related problems.
机译:来自美国国防部(DOD)和工业界的38位可靠性专家被要求确定并排序可能导致实际可靠性与预测可靠性(称为可靠性差)之间差异的订购因素。全面质量管理(TQM)工具用于分析关键差异对可靠性预测过程的关系和影响,并解释DOD和行业观点之间的明显差异。文献综述确定了11个因素可能是导致可靠性差异的原因。但是,专家们只注意到其中有六个是有意义的。确定的六个因素是:数据收集问题;预测技术的基础假设和使用;对操作环境缺乏了解;制造过程中的问题;短期管理重点;和设计相关的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号