首页> 外文会议>Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium >Field reliability versus predicted reliability: An analysis of root causes for the difference
【24h】

Field reliability versus predicted reliability: An analysis of root causes for the difference

机译:现场可靠性与预测可靠性:对差异的根本原因分析

获取原文

摘要

Thirty-eight reliability experts from the US Department of Defense (DOD) and industry were asked to identify and rank order factors which potentially contributed to the difference between actual and predicted reliabilities (referred to as the reliability delta). Total quality management (TQM) tools were used to analyze the relationships among and impact of key variances on the reliability prediction process and explain apparent differences between the DOD and industry perspectives. The literature review identified eleven factors as possible causes of the reliability delta; however, only six were noted as being significant by the experts. The six factors identified were: problems with data collection; assumptions underlying and use of prediction techniques; lack of understanding of the operational environment; problems with manufacturing processes; short-term management focus; and design-related problems.
机译:来自美国国防部(DOD)和工业部的三十八个可靠性专家识别和等级是可能导致实际和预测可靠性之间差异的秩序因素(称为可靠性三角洲)。全质量管理(TQM)工具用于分析关键差异对可靠性预测过程的关系和影响,并解释国防部和行业观点之间的明显差异。文献综述确定了可靠性三角洲可能原因的11个因素;但是,专家只注意到六只被认为是重要的。确定的六个因素是:数据收集问题;假设潜在和使用预测技术;缺乏对运营环境的理解;制造过程的问题;短期管理焦点;和设计相关的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号