首页> 外文会议>International fire science engineering conference >COMPARISON OF RESULTANT STEEL TEMPERATURES USING TRAVELLING FIRES AND TRADITIONAL METHODS: CASE STUDY FOR THE INFORMATICS FORUM BUILDING
【24h】

COMPARISON OF RESULTANT STEEL TEMPERATURES USING TRAVELLING FIRES AND TRADITIONAL METHODS: CASE STUDY FOR THE INFORMATICS FORUM BUILDING

机译:行进场法和传统方法得出的结果钢温度的比较:以信息论坛建设为例

获取原文

摘要

This paper calculates the steel temperatures resulting from a novel methodology based ontravelling fires to determine the design fire of large enclosures that are outside the range ofapplicability of current design methods. The methodology is applied to The Informatics Forum, amodern building in the city of Edinburgh finished in 2008 and which is seemed representative ofcomplex, modern architectural trends and with large enclosures. Analysis of three different steelbeams, protected and unprotected, and the results compared to those from traditional design methods(standard and parametric fire curves). The results indicate that more severe conditions are predictedfor small travelling fires of size 5 to 10% of the floor plate than for uniform fires assumed intraditional methods. Compared to the parametric fire curve, travelling fires lead up to 95% highersteel temperatures for unprotected steel, and up to 110% for protected with 39mm-gypsum.Traditional methods are more conservative only when compared to travelling fires larger than 85% ofthe floor plate.
机译:本文根据一种新的方法计算出钢的温度,该方法基于 行进火灾以确定超出范围的大型机壳的设计火灾 当前设计方法的适用性。该方法应用于“信息学论坛”,该论坛 爱丁堡市的现代建筑于2008年完工,似乎代表了 复杂的现代建筑趋势,并带有大型围墙。三种不同钢的分析 受保护和不受保护的光束,其结果与传统设计方法相比 (标准和参数火灾曲线)。结果表明,预计将出现更严重的状况 小型火灾占地板的5%到10%,而不是假定的均匀火灾 传统方法。与参数火灾曲线相比,行进火灾导致的火灾危险高达95% 对于未保护的钢材,最高温度为39%石膏保护的最高温度为110%。 传统方法仅比行进中大于85%的火灾更为保守 地板。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号