首页> 外文会议>Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society >A Comparison Between Random and Hairpin Winding in E-mobility Applications
【24h】

A Comparison Between Random and Hairpin Winding in E-mobility Applications

机译:电动汽车应用中随机缠绕和发夹缠绕的比较

获取原文

摘要

This paper presents a comparative study on traction motors built using random and hairpin winding. Advantages and disadvantages of each winding configuration are reported and challenges of using hairpin winding are detailed. The paper focus is placed on winding copper loss, which is the main root of performance differences in motor equipped by random and hairpin windings. A motor is designed using both winding types. Differences in losses and their effect on motor efficiency is studied. Considering the higher slot fill factor of hairpin winding, DC component of copper losses in hairpin winding has less contribution on the motor efficiency, however, higher AC copper loss is seen in hairpin windings. Thus, motors designed and manufactured using hairpin winding have higher efficiency in comparison to the equivalent random wound motors, especially at high load and low speed.
机译:本文对使用随机绕组和发夹绕组制造的牵引电动机进行了比较研究。报告了每种绕组配置的优缺点,并详细介绍了使用发夹绕组的挑战。本文的重点是绕组铜损,这是随机绕组和发夹绕组所造成的电动机性能差异的主要根源。电机是使用两种绕组类型设计的。研究了损耗差异及其对电机效率的影响。考虑到发夹绕组的较高的槽填充系数,发夹绕组中铜损耗的直流分量对电机效率的影响较小,但是,发夹绕组中的交流铜损耗更高。因此,与等效的随机绕线电动机相比,使用发夹式绕组设计和制造的电动机具有更高的效率,尤其是在高负载和低速情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号