首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems >Comparing Two IRT Models for Conjunctive Skills
【24h】

Comparing Two IRT Models for Conjunctive Skills

机译:比较两种IRT模型进行联合技能

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

A step in ITS often involve multiple skills. Thus a step requiring a conjunction of skills is harder than steps that require requiring each individual skill only. We developed two Item-Response Models -^sAdditive Factor Model (AFM) and Conjunctive Factor Model (CFM) - to model the conjunctive skills in the student data sets. Both models are compared on simulated data sets and a real assessment data set. We showed that CFM was as good as or better than AFM in the mean cross validation errors on the simulated data. In the real data set CFM is not clearly better. However, AFM is essentially performing as a conjunctive model.
机译:其往往涉及多种技能。因此,需要表达技能结合的步骤比仅需要每个单独的技能的步骤更难。我们开发了两个项目响应模型 - ^悲伤因子模型(AFM)和联合因子模型(CFM) - 以模拟学生数据集中的联合技能。在模拟数据集和实际评估数据集中进行比较这两种模型。我们展示CFM在模拟数据上的平均交叉验证误差中与AFM一样好或更好。在真实的数据集中,CFM并不明确。但是,AFM基本上表现为联合模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号