首页> 外文会议>International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering >Life cycle analysis of railway noise and vibration mitigation methodologies with respect to curve squeal noises
【24h】

Life cycle analysis of railway noise and vibration mitigation methodologies with respect to curve squeal noises

机译:铁路噪声与振动减缓方法曲线尖叫声噪声的生命周期分析

获取原文

摘要

Wheel/rail interface inevitably induces a travelling source of sound and vibration, which spread over a long distance of rail network and neighborhood corridor. The sound and vibration can be generated in various forms and spectra. The undesirable sound and vibration, is often called 'noise', includes rolling noise, impact noise, curve noise, mechanical noise, airborne noise, wheel/rail noise, structure- and ground-borne noises. The noise and vibration that is transferred back through the vehicle body mainly affects ride quality, customer experience, and structural integrity of the rolling stocks, whereas the vibration that is transmitted from the rails to the supporting structure of the track plays a main role in rapid track degradation and potentially affects the surrounding structures. This paper focuses on the effectiveness of noise mitigation measures on curved tracks located in urban environments. It highlights the practical methods for mitigating curve squeals and flanging noises, which are often observed along freight corridors and track infrastructures with nonlinear geometries. It is important to note that rail freight curve noises, especially for curve squeals, can be observed almost everywhere and every type of track structures. The most pressing noise appears at sharply curved tracks where excessive lateral wheel/rail dynamics resonate with falling friction states, generating a tonal noise problem, so-call 'squeal'. Therefore, this paper is devoted to systems thinking approach and life cycle assessment in resolving railway curve noise problems. The life cycle of fifty years has been selected as it is coincide with the majority of common design life for railway tracks catering freights, heavy haul trains, mixed traffics and heavy suburban trains globally. Based on assumptions commonly derived in rail industry, the life cycle analyses under variant extreme weather conditions reveal that the jetting method (or on-board wheel-based friction modifier) seems to be the most efficient method for mitigating curve noises, whilst the noise barrier seems to be the worst counterpart in a long curve section but this case is untrue for a sharp short curved track.
机译:车轮/轨道界面不可避免地引起一种热声和振动的行驶源,这在长途轨道网络和邻域走廊上传播。可以以各种形式和光谱产生声音和振动。不良声音和振动通常被称为“噪音”,包括滚动噪音,冲击噪声,曲线噪声,机械噪声,机械噪声,空降噪声,轮轨噪音,结构和地面噪音。通过车身转移回来的噪音和振动主要影响滚动股的乘坐质量,客户体验和结构完整性,而从轨道传递到轨道的支撑结构的振动在快速发挥着主要作用轨道劣化并可能影响周围结构。本文重点介绍了噪声缓解措施对城市环境弯曲轨道的有效性。它突出了减轻曲线尖叫声和凸出噪声的实用方法,这些方法通常沿着货运走廊和轨道基础设施与非线性几何形状观察。重要的是要注意,几乎无处不在各处和各种轨道结构的轨道货运曲线噪声,特别是对于曲线尖叫声。最紧迫的噪音出现在急剧弯曲的轨道上,过多的横向轮/轨道动力学与落下摩擦状态产生共鸣,产生音调噪音问题,所谓的“尖叫”。因此,本文致力于解决铁路曲线噪声问题的系统思维方法和生命周期评估。五十年的生命周期已被选中,因为它与铁路的大多数常见设计生活恰逢其当地,追逐货运货运,重拖车,混合的流量和全球沉重的郊区列车。基于轨道行业的假设,在变体极端天气条件下的生命周期分析表明,喷射方法(或板载车载基础摩擦修改器)似乎是减轻曲线噪声的最有效的方法,同时噪音屏障似乎是长曲线部分中最糟糕的对应物,但这种情况是一个锋利的短弯曲轨道不真实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号