首页> 外文会议>Annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics >Computational Analysis of Political Texts: Bridging Research Efforts Across Communities
【24h】

Computational Analysis of Political Texts: Bridging Research Efforts Across Communities

机译:政治文本的计算分析:跨社区研究工作的桥梁

获取原文

摘要

The development and adoption of natural language processing (NLP) methods by the political science community dates back to over twenty years ago. In the last decade the usage of computational methods for text analysis has drastically expandcd in scope and has become the focus of many social science studies, allowing for a sustained growth of the text-as-data community (Grimmer and Stewart, 2013). Political scientists have in particular focused on exploiting available texts as a valuable (additional) data source for a number of analyses types and tasks, including inferring policy positions of actors from tcxtual evidence (Lavcr et al., 2003; Slapin and Proksch, 2008; Lowe et al., 2011, inter alia), detecting topics (King and Lowe, 2003; Hopkins and King, 2010; Grimmer, 2010; Roberts et al, 2014), and analyzing stylistic aspects of texts, e.g., assessing the role of language ambiguity in framing the political agenda (Page, 1976; Campbell, 1983) or measuring the level of vagueness and concreteness in political statements (Baerg et al., 2018; Eichorst and Lin, 2018).
机译:政治科学界对自然语言处理(NLP)方法的开发和采用可以追溯到20多年前。在过去的十年中,将计算方法用于文本分析的范围已大大扩展,并已成为许多社会科学研究的重点,从而使文本数据社区得以持续增长(Grimmer和Stewart,2013年)。政治学家尤其关注于将可用的文本作为有价值的(附加的)数据源,用于许多分析类型和任务,包括从传统证据中推断参与者的政策立场(Lavcr等,2003; Slapin和Proksch,2008; Lavcr等,2003)。 Lowe等人,2011年,等等),检测主题(King和Lowe,2003年; Hopkins和King,2010年; Grimmer,2010年; Roberts等人,2014年),并分析文本的风格方面,例如,评估文本的作用。语言在确定政治议程时的含糊性(Page,1976; Campbell,1983)或衡量政治声明中模糊性和具体性的水平(Baerg等,2018; Eichorst and Lin,2018)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号