首页> 外文会议>International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management >A CASE STUDY IN PLANNING A RENEWABLE ENERGY SUPPLY CHAIN: PART II USING LIFE CYCLE ENVIRONMENTAL METRICS TO SELECT A BIOMASS FEEDSTOCK
【24h】

A CASE STUDY IN PLANNING A RENEWABLE ENERGY SUPPLY CHAIN: PART II USING LIFE CYCLE ENVIRONMENTAL METRICS TO SELECT A BIOMASS FEEDSTOCK

机译:规划可再生能源供应链的案例研究:第二部分使用生命周期环境指标选择生物质原料

获取原文

摘要

This work examines how environmental metrics impact the choice between alternative biomass feedstock supply chains for a bioenergy project. It focuses on life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions as important components when assessing biomass options for use at newly built or renovated bioenergy facilities. The wide variety in combinations of biomass energy feedstocks, collection methods, and regional cropping systems make each project unique. Therefore, a case study that had broadly applicable concepts was used as an example of biomass feedstock supply chain development. The case examined was the supply chain developed for the University of Minnesota, Morris renewable biomass heating facility located in rural West Central Minnesota. Though several feedstocks were initially considered, only corn stover (leaves, stalks, and cobs) and corn cobs seemed realistic options for life cycle modeling. Preliminary modeling indicates that both would significantly reduce fossil fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions compared to traditional natural gas or coal. However, the rather small difference in environmental impacts between biomass feedstocks suggests that other factors (cost, cultural practices, and inconveniences) may override specific environmental criteria unless there is a significant external cost for negative environmental impacts.
机译:这项工作研究了环境指标如何影响生物能源项目的替代生物量原料供应链之间的选择。它在评估新建或翻新的生物能源设施时,重点介绍生命周期能源和温室气体排放作为重要组成部分。生物质能量原料,收集方法和区域种植系统的各种组合使每个项目都是独一无二的。因此,使用具有广泛适用的概念的案例研究作为生物质原料供应链显影的一个例子。审议的案例是为明尼苏达大学开发的供应链,莫里斯可再生生物量加热设施位于明尼苏达州农村。虽然最初考虑了几种原料,但只有玉米秸秆(叶子,茎和玉米棒)和玉米COB似乎是生命周期建模的现实选择。初步建模表明,与传统天然气或煤相比,两者都将显着减少化石燃料使用和温室气体排放。然而,生物量原料之间的环境影响差异相当小,表明其他因素(成本,文化措施和不便)可能会覆盖特定的环境标准,除非存在对负面环境影响的重大外部成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号