首页> 外文会议>Safety-critical systems symposium >Automation Surprise in the 21st Century: Culture, Collaborative Cognition, Complexity and Legacy Systems
【24h】

Automation Surprise in the 21st Century: Culture, Collaborative Cognition, Complexity and Legacy Systems

机译:21世纪的自动化惊喜:文化,协作认知,复杂性和传统系统

获取原文

摘要

Automation surprises continue to be a significant safety concern, and the system safety community's search for effective strategies to mitigate them are ongoing. The literature has offered two fundamentally divergent directions, based on different ideas about the nature of cognition and collaboration with automation: a normative individual-cognition model and a sensemaking model based on distributed cognition. In this talk, I will run through the human factors and system safety investigation of an accident that illustrates an undiscovered niche of catastrophic risk-even in an ultra-safe system. A combination of culture, buggy mental models and legacy systems contributed critically in this case, and there was no appropriate training, no written guidance, no documentation, and no likelihood of operational experience that would insulate people from the kind of automation surprise and accident that happened. The sensemaking model suggests that our understanding of the interaction between humans and automation in a case such as the one discussed can be improved by taking into account culture, collaborative cognition, complexity and legacy systems vis-a-vis the operational context, rather than focusing on suboptimal human performance.
机译:自动化意外仍然是一个重大的安全隐患,并且系统安全界正在寻求缓解这些意外的有效策略。文献基于对认知本质和与自动化的协作的不同看法,提供了两个根本不同的方向:一个规范的个人认知模型和一个基于分布式认知的感官模型。在本次演讲中,我将对事故进行人为因素和系统安全性调查,以说明即使在超安全系统中也未发现灾难性风险的利基市场。在这种情况下,文化,错误的思维模式和遗留系统的结合是至关重要的,并且没有适当的培训,没有书面指导,没有文档,也没有可能使人们摆脱自动化意外和事故的操作经验的可能性。发生了感官模型建议,通过在操作环境中考虑文化,协作认知,复杂性和遗留系统,而不是集中精力,可以提高我们对这种情况下的人与自动化交互的理解。表现欠佳。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号