【24h】

An Accurate Fast Fluid Dynamics Model for Data Center Applications

机译:适用于数据中心应用的精确快速流体动力学模型

获取原文

摘要

Traditional CFD is broadly useful in the design and operation of reliable and efficient data centers. It is nevertheless computationally expensive, particularly when employed for design optimization, which usually requires multiple simulations. To speed-up calculations while retaining essential airflow physics, several researchers have turned to an alternative CFD methodology, namely, fast fluid dynamics (FFD). FFD has been reported to be much faster than traditional CFD, but at an assumed (acceptable) trade-off of reduced accuracy. However, a recent comparison of FFD and traditional CFD for data center plenum applications produced nearly indistinguishable results and suggested that previously-reported FFD/traditional-CFD differences were due primarily to inconsistent: 1) advection schemes, 2) computational grids, and 3) turbulence models. The present paper extends this FFD/traditional-CFD comparison to the data center whitespace and confirms the finding that a true like-for-like comparison produces nearly identical predictions. Our FFD implementation utilizes a first-order upwind finite-volume scheme for advection like traditional CFD, so alternative advection schemes (e.g., semi-Lagrangian) are not considered further here. Likewise, the effect of grid choice on traditional-CFD predictions is well known. However, the effect of turbulence model for data center applications has not been reported extensively so we do consider this topic further here. We compare the standard k- ∈ and a simpler algebraic model to benchmark experimental data from a real data center. We find that the algebraic turbulence model predicts rack-inlet temperatures at a similar level-of-accuracy as the k- ∈ model for our fairly-simple-airflow reference data center.
机译:传统CFD在可靠和高效的数据中心的设计和运行中广泛有用。然而,这在计算上是昂贵的,尤其是在用于设计优化时,通常需要多次仿真。为了在保留基本气流物理特性的同时加快计算速度,一些研究人员转向了另一种CFD方法,即快速流体动力学(FFD)。据报道,FFD的速度比传统的CFD快得多,但在折衷(降低)精度的前提下(可以接受)。但是,FFD和传统CFD在数据中心充气应用中的最新比较几乎无法区分,并表明先前报告的FFD /传统CFD差异主要是由于不一致:1)对流方案,2)计算网格和3)湍流模型。本文将这种FFD /传统CFD比较扩展到了数据中心空白,并证实了这样的发现,即真正的“类似”比较会产生几乎相同的预测。我们的FFD实现采用类似于传统CFD的对流一阶迎风有限体积方案,因此此处不再考虑其他对流方案(例如,半拉格朗日)。同样,网格选择对传统CFD预测的影响也是众所周知的。但是,湍流模型对数据中心应用的影响尚未得到广泛报道,因此我们在此进一步考虑该主题。我们将标准k-∈和更简单的代数模型进行比较,以对来自真实数据中心的实验数据进行基准测试。我们发现,对于我们相当简单的空气参考数据中心,代数湍流模型以与k-∈模型相似的精度水平预测机架入口温度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号