首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Urban Regeneration and Sustainability >The effectiveness of community participation in planning and urban development
【24h】

The effectiveness of community participation in planning and urban development

机译:社区参与规划和城市发展的有效性

获取原文

摘要

Contemporary planning theories acknowledge the value of community participation in the development processes of our built environment, suggesting that community involvement has the potential to achieve a more sustainable outcome. Research in this field indicates that citizen participation can generate trust, credibility and commitment regarding the implementation of policies. This paper investigates tools to measure the effectiveness of public participation and their influence on urban development processes. Based on a literature review, a framework of indicators was developed, which has been used to analyse the community participation process in the development of the 'Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy', a collaborative initiative to develop a growth strategy for the Christchurch region in New Zealand. Results from this case study suggest that there is a relationship between the various indicators and the main findings can be summarized as follows: (ⅰ) Most sectors of the community appear to have an interest in their built environment and urban planning processes, provided that their involvement is encouraged by stimulating information and expertise is provided to support their contributions. (ⅱ) Although no conclusions on the motivation of the various participants in the process were reached, the professionals involved appear to have a strong interest in networking and the sharing of expertise, (ⅲ) A commonality in the views of the public was observed, with a focus on the 'big picture' rather than self-interests, (ⅳ) Collaborative planning was experienced as an effective technique for consensus building between professionals, (ⅴ) The quality of resources and allocation of time appear to be influential in a community participation process, (ⅵ) Indications were given that process and product outcomes should not be evaluated separately.
机译:当代规划理论承认社区参与我们建造环境的发展过程的价值,这表明社区参与有可能实现更可持续的结果。该领域的研究表明,公民参与可以产生关于政策执行情况的信任,可信度和承诺。本文调查了衡量公众参与的有效性及其对城市发展过程的影响的工具。基于文献综述,制定了一项指标框架,已被用于分析社区参与过程,以发展“更大的基督城城市发展战略”,这是一种开展新的基督城地区增长战略的合作倡议西兰。结果来自本案研究表明,各种指标与主要结果之间存在关系,可以概括如下:(Ⅰ)社区的大多数部门似乎对其建造的环境和城市规划流程感兴趣,但其通过刺激信息和专业知识来鼓励参与,以支持他们的贡献。 (Ⅱ)虽然没有结论该过程中各种参与者的动机,但参与的专业人士似乎对网络的兴趣和专业知识的共享,(Ⅲ)观察到公众意见的共性,重点关注“大图”而不是自身利益,(ⅳ)协作规划被赋予专业人士之间建设的有效技术,(ⅴ)资源质量和时间的分配似乎在社区中有影响力参与流程,(ⅵ)指示的指示是不应单独评估过程和产品结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号