首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Electrical and Energy Conference >Comparison of Decision Tree Attribute Selection Methods for Static Voltage Stability Margin Assessment
【24h】

Comparison of Decision Tree Attribute Selection Methods for Static Voltage Stability Margin Assessment

机译:静态电压稳定性保证金评估决策树属性选择方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

Decision tree (DT) as an effective data mining method has been widely used in voltage stability assessment. The selection of decision tree’s input attributes is critical because input attributes affect the accuracy and efficiency of the decision tree. This paper compares two attribute selection methods: participation factor method and Relief-F algorithm. Participation factor method is based on modal analysis of Jacobi matrix, while Relief-F algorithm is a mathematical approach that does not require power system knowledge. Two DTs with the same number of input attributes identified by participation factor analysis and Relief-F algorithm respectively are constructed for comparison in term of accuracy and efficiency. A case study on a practical power system indicates that two methods identify similar attributes and the accuracy of two DTs are close.
机译:决策树(DT)作为有效的数据挖掘方法已广泛用于电压稳定性评估。决策树的输入属性的选择至关重要,因为输入属性会影响决策树的准确性和效率。本文比较了两个属性选择方法:参与因子方法和浮雕-F算法。参与因子方法基于Jacobi矩阵的模态分析,而浮雕-F算法是一种不需要电力系统知识的数学方法。具有参与因子分析和Cref-F算法识别的具有相同数量的输入属性数量的两个DTS,以便在准确性和效率方面进行比较。对实际电力系统的案例研究表明,两种方法识别类似的属性,两个DTS的准确性接近。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号