首页> 外文会议>2018 IEEE 2nd International Electrical and Energy Conference >Comparison of Decision Tree Attribute Selection Methods for Static Voltage Stability Margin Assessment
【24h】

Comparison of Decision Tree Attribute Selection Methods for Static Voltage Stability Margin Assessment

机译:静态电压稳定裕度评估的决策树属性选择方法比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Decision tree (DT) as an effective data mining method has been widely used in voltage stability assessment. The selection of decision tree’s input attributes is critical because input attributes affect the accuracy and efficiency of the decision tree. This paper compares two attribute selection methods: participation factor method and Relief-F algorithm. Participation factor method is based on modal analysis of Jacobi matrix, while Relief-F algorithm is a mathematical approach that does not require power system knowledge. Two DTs with the same number of input attributes identified by participation factor analysis and Relief-F algorithm respectively are constructed for comparison in term of accuracy and efficiency. A case study on a practical power system indicates that two methods identify similar attributes and the accuracy of two DTs are close.
机译:决策树(DT)作为一种有效的数据挖掘方法已广泛用于电压稳定性评估中。决策树的输入属性的选择至关重要,因为输入属性会影响决策树的准确性和效率。本文比较了两种属性选择方法:参与因子方法和Relief-F算法。参与因子法基于Jacobi矩阵的模态分析,而Relief-F算法是一种不需要电力系统知识的数学方法。分别构建了两个由参与因子分析和Relief-F算法识别的具有相同数量输入属性的DT,以进行准确性和效率方面的比较。实际电源系统的案例研究表明,两种方法可以识别相似的属性,并且两个DT的准确性接近。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号