首页> 外文会议>AIAA aerospace sciences meeting;AIAA SciTech forum >(Un)controlled Flight into Terrain: A History of Obstacle Clearance Regulations
【24h】

(Un)controlled Flight into Terrain: A History of Obstacle Clearance Regulations

机译:(不受管制)飞往地形:清除障碍法规的历史

获取原文

摘要

Because aviation is comprehensively regulated, commercial flying is safer than it ever was before. This was not the case during the early years of aviation. Back in the early 1930's, only limited regulations governed takeoff distance (land based aircraft were expected to takeoff in less under 1000-ft) and all-engines-operating climb (the "Rule of Eight," which required aircraft to have an all engines operative climb rate (in ft/min) of eight times its stall speed (in knots)). In this paper, we make a historical inquiry into the evolution of regulations governing the takeoff obstacle clearance problem. We show that the FAA, and its predecessor agencies, typically establish and amend Federal Aviation Regulations on a reactionary-not proactive-basis after high profile crashes. We trace amendments to key regulations governing the obstacle clearance problem to specific air accidents where insufficient climb performance was deemed as the probable cause of death.
机译:由于航空受到全面监管,因此商业飞行比以往任何时候都更加安全。在航空初期,情况并非如此。早在1930年代初期,只有有限的法规来控制起飞距离(预计陆基飞机的起飞距离应在1000英尺以下)和全机运行的爬升(“八人制”,要求飞机必须配备全引擎)爬升速度(以英尺/分钟为单位)为其失速速度(以节为单位)的八倍)。在本文中,我们对控制起飞障碍物清除问题的法规的演变进行了历史性的研究。我们表明,美国联邦航空局及其前身机构通常会在发生重大事故后根据反动而不是主动的基础建立并修改《联邦航空条例》。我们追踪有关障碍物清除问题的主要法规的修订,这些法规适用于特定的空中事故,在这些事故中,爬升性能不足被认为是可能的死亡原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号