首页> 外文会议>IEEE/AIAA Digital Avionics Systems Conference >Evaluation of Multiple Flow Constrained Area Capacity Setting Methods for Collaborative Trajectory Options Program
【24h】

Evaluation of Multiple Flow Constrained Area Capacity Setting Methods for Collaborative Trajectory Options Program

机译:协同弹道选择程序的多流受限区域容量设置方法评估

获取原文

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare flow constrained area (FCA) capacity setting methods for a Collaborative Trajectory Options Program (CTOP) as they pertain to the Integrated Demand Management (IDM) concept. IDM uses flow balancing to manage air traffic across multiple FCAs with a common downstream constraint, as well as constraints at the respective FCA locations. FCA capacity rates can be set manually, but generating capacities for multiple, interdependent FCAs could potentially over-burden a user. A new enhancement to CTOP called the FCA Balance Algorithm (FBA) was developed at NASA Ames Research Center to improve the process of capacity allocation. The FBA evaluates predicted demand and capacity across multiple FCAs and dynamically generates capacity settings for the FCAs that best meet capacity limits for all identified constraints. In a human-in-the-loop simulation study, subject matter experts were asked to use three different methods to allocate capacity to three FCAs, either (1) manually for every 60-minute time window, (2) manually for every 15-minute time window, or (3) by using the FBA capability to automatically generate capacity settings. Results showed no differences in terms of overall system performance, indicated by similar ground delay and airport throughput numbers between methods. However, differences in individual strategies afforded by the manual methods allowed some participants to achieve system-wide delay that was much lower than the average. The FBA was the fastest method of capacity setting, and it received the lowest subjective rating scores on physical task load, mental task load, task difficulty and task complexity out of the three methods. Finally, participants explained through qualitative feedback that there were many benefits to using the FBA, such as ease of use, precision, and low risk of human input error. These results suggest that the FBA automation enhancement to CTOP maintains system performance while improving human performance.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较协作轨迹选择程序(CTOP)的流量受限区域(FCA)能力设置方法,因为它们与综合需求管理(IDM)概念有关。 IDM使用流平衡来管理多个具有共同的下游约束以及各个FCA位置约束的FCA之间的空中交通。可以手动设置FCA容量速率,但是为多个相互依赖的FCA生成容量可能会给用户带来负担。 NASA Ames研究中心开发了一种新的CTOP增强功能,称为FCA平衡算法(FBA),以改进容量分配过程。亚马逊物流评估多个FCA的预计需求和容量,并动态生成FCA的容量设置,以最能满足所有已确定约束的容量限制。在环人仿真研究中,主题专家被要求使用三种不同的方法为三个FCA分配容量,或者(1)每60分钟的时间窗手动分配一次,(2)每15分钟的时间手动分配一次分钟时间窗口,或(3)使用FBA功能自动生成容量设置。结果表明,在总体系统性能方面没有差异,方法之间的相似地面延迟和机场吞吐次数表明了这一点。但是,手动方法提供的各个策略的差异使某些参与者可以实现比平均水平低得多的系统范围延迟。 FBA是最快的能力设置方法,在三种方法中,其对身体任务负荷,心理任务负荷,任务难度和任务复杂性的主观评分得分最低。最后,参与者通过定性反馈解释说,使用FBA有许多好处,例如易用性,精确性和较低的人为输入错误风险。这些结果表明,FBA对CTOP的自动化增强功能可以在保持系统性能的同时提高人员性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号