首页> 外文会议>International specialty conference on cold-formed steel structures >Stressed skin design of steel sheeting panels - Part 2: Shear panels with sheeting fixed on all 4 sides
【24h】

Stressed skin design of steel sheeting panels - Part 2: Shear panels with sheeting fixed on all 4 sides

机译:镶板的受力蒙皮设计-第2部分:在全部4面都固定有板的剪力板

获取原文

摘要

In this paper, the strength and stiffness of different roof panels were investigated, in order to establish their ability to act as in-plane diaphragms for stressed skin design of cold-formed steel portal frames. A total of 6 roof panels, approximately 3 × 3m, were examined by testing with sheeting profiles fixed on 4 sides. A variety of sheeting profiles in two industry standard thicknesses of 0.5 and 0.7mm were tested, all using top-hat shaped purlins fixed with self-drilling, self-tapping screws. The experimental strength and stiffness of each panel were then compared against existing design methods. The Finite Element Analysis (FEA) modelling techniques were also presented and validated against series of full-scale tests. The FEA results have shown that the 'true' level of loading transferred via shear connector screws was on average 13% lower than that assumed by standard design methods. On the contrary, seam connections failure, according to FEA results, have governed a design in all of the analysed cases and the analytical method overestimated shear resistances of the panels by 45% and 35% in case of 0.5mm and 0.7mm thick sheeting profiles respectively. It was demonstrated that FEA results have represented the upper bound of experimental shear stiffness, with a very close prediction for 0.5mm thick sheeting profiles. Overall all, the tested panels demonstrated an average 41% greater flexibility then this predicted using FEA models.
机译:在本文中,研究了不同屋顶板的强度和刚度,以建立其用作冷弯钢门式框架受力蒙皮设计的平面隔板的能力。通过在固定于4个侧面的薄片型材进行测试,检查了总共6个大约3×3m的屋顶面板。测试了两种厚度为0.5和0.7毫米的行业标准薄板轮廓,所有这些薄板轮廓均使用顶帽形状的pur条固定,这些pur条用自钻,自攻螺钉固定。然后将每个面板的实验强度和刚度与现有设计方法进行比较。还介绍了有限元分析(FEA)建模技术,并针对一系列全面测试进行了验证。 FEA结果表明,通过剪切连接器螺钉传递的“真实”载荷水平平均比标准设计方法所假定的水平低13%。相反,根据有限元分析的结果,接缝连接失效是所有分析案例中的设计主因,而分析方法高估了0.5mm和0.7mm厚度的板材时面板的抗剪强度分别为45%和35%。分别。事实证明,有限元分析结果代表了实验剪切刚度的上限,对于0.5mm厚的板材轮廓,其预测非常精确。总体而言,测试面板显示出的灵活性比使用FEA模型预测的灵活性高出41%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号