首页> 外文会议>AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference;AIAA aviation forum >Comparison of Sensitivity Analysis Methods for Structural Shape Optimization
【24h】

Comparison of Sensitivity Analysis Methods for Structural Shape Optimization

机译:结构形状优化灵敏度分析方法的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The primary motivation of this research is to compare different sensitivity analysis methods used in structural shape optimization. Gradient based optimization schemes are often driven by the accuracy of the gradients or sensitivities. If the sensitivities at each design point are accurate, the optimizer converges to the expected logical optimum solution. Sizing optimization as well as shape optimization routines are considered here because if the shape design variables are involved, sensitivity analysis is more challenging because most of the sensitivity analysis schemes require calculation of mesh sensitivities which are computationally expensive and tend to be less accurate. In this work, a cantilevered hollow circular rod problem is used to compare sensitivity analysis methods such as finite difference method, discrete analytic method and continuum sensitivity analysis. It is expected that continuum sensitivity analysis would be the most promising among these methods since it is proven to be more accurate than the other methods. The best scheme however would be an acceptable tradeoff between accuracy and computation cost and ease of implementation of the sensitivity analysis method within the optimization framework.
机译:这项研究的主要动机是比较用于结构形状优化的不同灵敏度分析方法。基于梯度的优化方案通常由梯度或灵敏度的准确性来驱动。如果每个设计点的灵敏度都是准确的,则优化器将收敛到预期的逻辑最优解。这里考虑尺寸优化以及形状优化例程,因为如果涉及形状设计变量,则灵敏度分析更具挑战性,因为大多数灵敏度分析方案都需要计算网格灵敏度,这在计算上是昂贵的并且往往不太准确。在这项工作中,悬臂空心圆杆问题用于比较灵敏度分析方法,例如有限差分法,离散分析法和连续谱灵敏度分析。可以预期,连续性敏感性分析将是这些方法中最有前途的,因为它已被证明比其他方法更为准确。然而,最好的方案是在准确性和计算成本之间以及在优化框架内易于实施灵敏度分析方法之间达成可接受的折衷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号