首页> 外文会议>Annual conference of the International Society of Exposure Science >Social and environmental determinants of disaster preparedness among U.S. adults
【24h】

Social and environmental determinants of disaster preparedness among U.S. adults

机译:美国成年人备灾的社会和环境决定因素

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Epidemiologic studies have identified several sociodemographic risk factors for disaster-related morbidity and mortality, including low socioeconomic status and racial/ethnic minority status. Disaster preparedness can improve an individual's ability to cope with the health effects of environmental disasters and public health emergencies. This study evaluated the relationship between sociodemographic, health, and environmental factors and disaster preparedness among U.S. adults. Methods: Data from the U.S. CDC's 2006-2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) surveys were used to estimate the prevalence of four household preparedness items (3-day supply of water, 3-day supply of nonperishable food, a battery-operated radio with working batteries, a flashlight with working batteries). Multivariable logistic regression, accounting for the complex sampling design of the BRFSS, was used to evaluate associations between individual factors (age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, income, employment status, chronic disease status, perceived health, urban-rural residence) and household preparedness. Results: The study sample consisted of 96,137 adults aged 18 years and older who responded to questions about household preparedness. Overall, 42% (95% CI=40, 44%) of the sample reported all four preparedness items. Older participants and those with at least some college or technical school education were more likely to be prepared. Women participants (OR = 0.71, 95% CI=0.67, 0.75), participants with fair or poor perceived health (OR = 0.81, 95% Cl=0.74, 0.88), and urban residents (OR = 0.91, 95% CI=0.85, 0.96) were less likely to report household preparedness. There were no differences between racial/ethnic groups. Conclusions: Our study identified subgroups with low levels of household preparedness. Further work is needed to identify and implement disaster preparedness interventions for these vulnerable populations.
机译:背景:流行病学研究已经确定了与灾害相关的发病率和死亡率的几个社会人口统计学危险因素,包括较低的社会经济地位和种族/族裔少数地位。备灾可以提高个人应对环境灾难和公共卫生突发事件对健康的影响的能力。这项研究评估了社会人口统计学,健康和环境因素与美国成年人之间的灾难准备之间的关系。方法:使用美国疾病预防控制中心(CDC)2006-2012年行为风险因素监视系统(BRFSS)调查中的数据来估算四种家庭准备项目的患病率(3天供水,3天不易腐烂食品供应,电池供电)带工作电池的收音机,带工作电池的手电筒)。多变量logistic回归分析了BRFSS的复杂抽样设计,用于评估各个因素(年龄,性别,种族/民族,教育,婚姻状况,收入,就业状况,慢性病状况,可感知的健康状况,城市人口,农村居民)和家庭准备。结果:该研究样本由96,137名18岁以上的成年人组成,他们回答了有关家庭准备的问题。总体而言,有42%(95%CI = 40,44%)的样品报告了所有四个准备项目。年龄较大的参与者以及至少具有大学或技术学校学历的参与者更有可能做好准备。女性参与者(OR = 0.71,95%CI = 0.67,0.75),健康状况中等或较差的参与者(OR = 0.81,95%Cl = 0.74,0.88)和城市居民(OR = 0.91,95%CI = 0.85 ,0.96)报告家庭准备的可能性较小。种族/族裔群体之间没有差异。结论:我们的研究确定了家庭准备水平较低的亚组。需要开展进一步工作,为这些弱势群体确定和实施防灾措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号