首页> 外文会议>Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering >Comparison of ECG fiducial point extraction methods based on dynamic Bayesian network
【24h】

Comparison of ECG fiducial point extraction methods based on dynamic Bayesian network

机译:基于动态贝叶斯网络的心电图基准点提取方法比较

获取原文

摘要

Cardiovascular diseases are one of the major causes of mortality in humans. One way to diagnose heart diseases and abnormalities is processing of cardiac signals such as electrocardiogram (ECG) signal. In many ECG analysis, location of peak, onset and offset of ECG waves must be extracted as a preprocessing step. These points are called ECG fiducial points (FPs) and convey clinically useful information. In this paper, we compare some FP extraction methods including three methods proposed recently by our research team. These methods are based on extended Kalman filter (EKF), hidden Markov model (HMM) and switching Kalman filter (SKF). Results are given for ECG signals of QT database. For all proposed methods, the mean of estimation error across all FPs are less than 4 msec (one sample) and their root mean square error are less than 17 msec (almost 4 samples). The proposed methods are also compared with two other methods based on wavelet transform and partially collapsed Gibbs sampler (PCGS). The obtained results by proposed methods outperform two other methods.
机译:心血管疾病是人类死亡的主要原因之一。诊断心脏疾病和异常的一种方法是处理心脏信号,例如心电图(ECG)信号。在许多ECG分析中,必须提取ECG波的峰值,开始和偏移的位置作为预处理步骤。这些点称为ECG基准点(FPs),可传达临床上有用的信息。在本文中,我们比较了一些FP提取方法,包括我们研究团队最近提出的三种方法。这些方法基于扩展卡尔曼滤波器(EKF),隐马尔可夫模型(HMM)和切换卡尔曼滤波器(SKF)。给出了QT数据库ECG信号的结果。对于所有提出的方法,所有FP的估计误差均值均小于4毫秒(一个样本),其均方根误差小于17毫秒(几乎4个样本)。还将所提出的方法与其他两种基于小波变换和部分折叠的吉布斯采样器(PCGS)的方法进行了比较。通过提议的方法获得的结果优于其他两种方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号