首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Live Maintenance >Selection of PPE — Practical experience of different arc assessment methods and their comparison
【24h】

Selection of PPE — Practical experience of different arc assessment methods and their comparison

机译:PPE的选择-不同电弧评估方法的实践经验及其比较

获取原文

摘要

According to European and worldwide OSHA regulation and existing arc testing standards it is necessary for people in charge to select appropriate PPE in order to the arc energy level at the working place. Cause of two existing different arc assessment methods it's up to the manager to decide which assessment method is the proper one. While the arc assessment on the basis of NFPA 70E and IEEE 1584 is worldwide most common, the German based assessment on the DGUV standard 203-077 slightly start to get more attention outside of Germany. Both arc assessment methods are strictly bonded to the associated PPE arc rating method. The paper deals with experience of use of both assessment methods in utilities and industry. It shows in a comparison advantages and disadvantages of both methods together with the impacts of the assessment results on the selection of arc protection PEE.
机译:根据欧洲和全球OSHA法规以及现有的电弧测试标准,负责人有必要选择合适的PPE,以达到工作场所的电弧能水平。由于存在两种不同的电弧评估方法,应由经理决定哪种评估方法是正确的。尽管基于NFPA 70E和IEEE 1584的电弧评估在全球范围内最为普遍,但基于德国DGUV标准203-077的电弧评估在德国以外的地区开始引起更多关注。两种电弧评估方法都严格关联到相关的PPE电弧评级方法。本文介绍了在公用事业和工业中使用这两种评估方法的经验。通过比较,它显示了两种方法的优缺点,以及评估结果对电弧保护PEE的选择的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号