首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Medical Education and Practice >Alternative Strategy Adopted in Practical Assessment for Pathology Postgraduate Certification Examination Amidst COVID-19 Nationwide Lockdown: An Indian Experience with a Novel Hybrid Method of Assessment
【24h】

Alternative Strategy Adopted in Practical Assessment for Pathology Postgraduate Certification Examination Amidst COVID-19 Nationwide Lockdown: An Indian Experience with a Novel Hybrid Method of Assessment

机译:对病理学研究生认证考试实际评估采用的替代策略在Covid-19全国锁定中:一种新的杂种评估方法的印度经验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: A major concern and challenge faced by the educational institution during coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic and consequent lockdown is the timely conduct of the summative assessment. Unlike cognitive assessment, real-time practical assessment through online mode, without compromising principles of assessment is difficult. This study was performed to analyze an alternative hybrid approach adopted for the postgraduate practical summative assessment in pathology. Materials and Methods: Evaluation of the process of summative assessment was done where internal and external examiners synchronously assessed examinees real-time on-site (face to face) and off-site (remotely through live videoconferencing) respectively. A pre-validated questionnaire on a novel approach for assessment and feedback (with close-ended on 5-point Likert scale and open-ended questions) were administered to nine participants comprising three final year postgraduates in pathology, four examiners (two internal and two externals) and two technical experts from the Department of Pathology. Overall scores obtained by all examinees were recorded. A pre-validated questionnaire and feedback were administered to the participants to assess the novel approach to assessment. Results: The mean performance score obtained by examinees was 63.5% in the summative assessment. Feedback analysis revealed that 85% of participants strongly agreed and the rest (15%) agreed that essential minor deviations introduced in this novel mode of assessment did not compromise basic principles and goals of assessment. Quality of assessment through this mode of assessment was graded as good to excellent. All participants responded that this mode of examination may be applied in the future under similar circumstances. Conclusion: This study concludes that an alternative novel hybrid method of real-time synchronous assessment with on-site and off-site examiners may be a feasible and successful model for conducting summative assessment and can be practiced in time of need.
机译:背景:冠状病毒疾病(Covid-19)大流行和随后的锁定期间,教育机构面临的主要关注和挑战是及时进行总结评估。与认知评估不同,通过在线模式实时进行实际评估,而不会影响评估原则是困难的。本研究进行了分析对病理学研究生实际总结评估采用的另一种混合方法。材料和方法:在内部和外部审查员同步评估中,分别评估了总结评估过程的评估,分别对现场(面对面)和非现场(远程通过实时视频会议)进行考生。关于评估和反馈的新方法预先验证的问卷(以5分李克特规模和开放式问题近端的近端结束)给了九个参与者,其中包括在病理学中的三个后一年的研究生,四个审查员(两个内部和两个来自病理系的外部)和两个技术专家。记录所有考生获得的总数。向参与者提供预先验证的问卷和反馈,以评估评估的新方法。结果:总结评估中考试获得的平均性能评分为63.5%。反馈分析显示,85%的参与者强烈同意,其余的(15%)同意在这部新颖的评估模式下引入的基本次要偏差并未妥协评估的基本原则和目标。通过这种评估模式的评估质量被评为优良。所有参与者都回应了这种检查模式可以在类似情况下在未来应用。结论:本研究得出结论,与现场和场外审查员的实时同步评估的替代新型混合方法可能是用于进行总结评估的可行和成功的模型,可以在需要时实行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号