首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Information Technology, Information Systems and Electrical Engineering >Heuristic evaluation of online satisfaction survey system for public healthcare service: Applying analytical hierarchical process
【24h】

Heuristic evaluation of online satisfaction survey system for public healthcare service: Applying analytical hierarchical process

机译:公共卫生服务在线满意度调查系统的启发式评估:应用层次分析法

获取原文

摘要

This paper aims to evaluate usability factors of online satisfaction survey system for public healthcare service. The evaluation was performed to analyze issues of usability factors, which is relevant to user interface design by applying Analysis Hierarchy Process (AHP) to prioritize their level of challenges. The study focuses on 10 Jakob Nielsen's heuristics principles as main usability factors. Based on main factors, 43 sub-factors are determined. Relevant data was collected through questionnaires by surveying 24 persons, including programmers, system analyst, students, lecturers, and general users. Next, researchers calculated values of data by using Expert Choice. The result shows the first 5 levels of usability factors that are challenges in a form of percentage rate respectively. The factors of recognition rather than recall (81%); help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors (78%); match between system and real world (77%); user control and freedom (76%) and consistency and standards (74%). The challenge rate of all usability factors reveal 72% while non-challenge rate is only 28%. From the result of this study we can conclude that existing online applications of satisfaction survey system for public healthcare service need to be improved. The improvement can be taken by prioritizing the usability factors based on level of challenges that found in this study.
机译:本文旨在评估公共卫生服务在线满意度调查系统的可用性因素。进行评估是为了分析可用性因素的问题,这些问题与用户界面设计有关,方法是应用分析层次过程(AHP)来确定其挑战级别的优先级。该研究集中于10个雅各布·尼尔森的启发式原则作为主要的可用性因素。基于主要因素,确定了43个子因素。通过调查24位人员(包括程序员,系统分析师,学生,讲师和一般用户),通过问卷调查收集了相关数据。接下来,研究人员通过使用“专家选择”来计算数据值。结果显示了可用性因素的前5个级别,分别以百分比的形式表示了挑战。认可而不是回忆的因素(81%);帮助用户识别,诊断错误并从错误中恢复(78%);系统与现实世界之间的匹配度(77%);用户控制和自由(76%)以及一致性和标准(74%)。所有可用性因素的挑战率显示为72%,而非挑战率仅为28%。从这项研究的结果,我们可以得出结论,需要改进现有在线满意度调查系统在公共医疗服务方面的在线应用。可以通过根据本研究中发现的挑战级别对可用性因素进行优先级排序来进行改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号