首页> 外文会议>International astronautical congress >UNPREDICTABLE FUTURE? —THE PRINCIPLE IN OUTER SPACE TREATY ON SPACE RESOURCES MINING AND NATIONAL COMMERCIAL SPACE LEGISLATION
【24h】

UNPREDICTABLE FUTURE? —THE PRINCIPLE IN OUTER SPACE TREATY ON SPACE RESOURCES MINING AND NATIONAL COMMERCIAL SPACE LEGISLATION

机译:不可预测的未来? -空间资源开采与国家商业空间立法的外空条约原则

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

1. The U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act ("the Act"), in the most controversial §51303, confirmed the non-state actors' rights over extracted asteroid/space resource. This extensive interpretation played loose with the principle set forth in Article II of Outer Space Treaty. It gives rise to two main issues: a. US 2015 Space Act puts its stance opposite to the expansion made to Outer Space Treaty by Moon Agreement. Then which interpretation should be regarded as the follow-on of the principle set in Outer Space Treaty regarding space mining? b. What, influence this Act may have on the future commercialization of space, especially from the perspective of national legislation of other spacefaring countries. 2. "Province of All Mankind" or "Common Heritage of Mankind" Outer Space Treaty confirmed the right of "free exploration and use" of all States, but it did not make clear whether this right includes the right to take and consume the natural space resource. At the same time, it set forth the principle of non-appropriation over Outer Space, including the Moon and the other celestial bodies, but did not address whether the space resource is covered under this principle. The distinction has been drawn between the concepts of "province of all mankind" and "common heritage of mankind". Some scholars tried to use the right to fish in high seas as an economic template to space mining in order to justify the stance US has taken in §51303. But outer space is most commonly compared to the the seabed and ocean floor and the subsoil thereof, on which the concept of "common heritage of mankind" is applied. Which analogy should be drawn to the space/asteroid resource is closely related to the interpretation of the principles set in Outer Space Treaty. 3. Space Commercialization and the Legislation a. Legislation Trend On the one hand, the Act may trigger the protest in the international community against the unilateral exploit of space resource. On the other hand, it may make it clear that it is recognizing, encouraging and protecting the incentive to develop technology of space mining, and therefore followed by more and more countries. b. China Space Legislation It is proposed that China should speed up its national space legislation process. It is necessary, at this crucial point, to explore China's options of legislation on commercial space activities and its possible effect.
机译:1.美国商业太空发射竞争力法美国商业太空发射竞争力法(以下简称“该法”),在最具争议的§51303中,确认了非国家行为者对提取的小行星/太空资源的权利。这种广泛的解释与《外层空间条约》第二条所阐述的原则相去甚远。它引起了两个主要问题:美国《 2015年太空法》的立场与《月球协定》对《外层空间条约》的扩展相反。那么,哪种解释应被视为《外层空间条约》中有关空间开采的原则的后续? b。该法案可能对太空的未来商业化产生什么影响,尤其是从其他太空国家的国家立法的角度来看。 2.“全人类的省”或“全人类的共同遗产”外层空间条约确认了所有国家“自由探索和使用”的权利,但并未明确表明该权利是否包括获取和消费自然资源的权利。空间资源。同时,它提出了不对包括月球和其他天体在内的外层空间进行侵占的原则,但没有解决空间资源是否被该原则涵盖的问题。在“全人类的省”和“全人类的共同遗产”的概念之间进行了区分。一些学者试图将在公海捕鱼的权利作为太空采矿的经济模板,以证明美国在第51303条中所采取的立场是正确的。但是,外层空间通常与海底,海底及其底土相比较,在海底和海底及其底土上应用了“人类共同遗产”的概念。应该用哪种类比空间/小行星资源与对《外层空间条约》中设定的原则的解释密切相关。 3.空间商业化和立法a。立法趋势一方面,该法案可能引发国际社会对单方面利用空间资源的抗议。另一方面,它可能清楚地表明,它正在认识,鼓励和保护发展空间采矿技术的动机,因此越来越多的国家紧随其后。 b。中国空间立法建议中国应加快其国家空间立法进程。在这一关键时刻,有必要探讨中国关于商业空间活动的立法选择及其可能产生的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号