首页> 外文会议>International astronautical congress >REACHING FOR THE MOON AND BEYOND? SOCIOPOLITICAL FRONTIERS IN THE SPACE RACE TO MARS
【24h】

REACHING FOR THE MOON AND BEYOND? SOCIOPOLITICAL FRONTIERS IN THE SPACE RACE TO MARS

机译:到达月亮和超越?火星在太空中的社会政治阵线

获取原文

摘要

1. Defining the issue(s): Dealing with the historical dependence of space agencies 2. The sociological analyze and its counter-measures: defining a roadinap to extra-solar system exploration "Why do nations undertake spaceflights, and why should they? It is a question equally important for understanding the history of spaceflights and for divining its future. And it is a question that history is in a unique position to illuminate." Indeed, one can really understand present decisions studying past one. and how repetition in history can influence plans to come in the future. Political science calls this historical relativcncss the institutional "path dependence", meaning that a political decision by a government is dependent of its past orientations. The same phenomenon can be observed in space agencies' programs. Indeed, governments involved on the international space stage have different institutional, technical and scientific background concerning how to build and drive a space program. Innovation, organizations, sharing knowledge, civil society involvement. It is so a matter of transferring, translating and trading skills between space powers involved in a same program. For example, despite their technological level, the United Arabic Emirates' space agency remains less experienced than Nasa regarding the capacity of looking backward and learn from past's failures, or to deal with public institutions. Space activities arc all about learning from the past. And concerning race to Mars and international collaboration, the International Space Station is an undoubtedly good example. In such a context of globalization and because of space activities' costs, international partnership is requested. Hence we should start looking at dispositive allowing to build a solid political model which could efficiently schedule long-duration manned spaceflights (even beyond our solar system in the next decades). What we propose here is a presentation of original ways to go further, in order to send human beings on the Martian ground. The current presentation will aim to propose a sociological roadmap for an interface allowing international cooperation, being aware of this "historical dependence" causing inequalities and perturbation in the knowledge and skills transfers between governmental agencies.
机译:1.定义一个或多个问题:处理空间机构的历史依赖2.社会学分析及其对策:定义太阳系外系统探索的道路“国家为什么进行太空飞行,为什么要进行太空飞行?这是一个对理解航天历史和预示其未来​​同样重要的问题。而且,历史在阐明照明方面具有独特的地位。”确实,人们可以真正理解研究过去的当前决策。以及历史的重复如何影响未来的计划。政治学将此历史相对性称为制度上的“路径依赖”,这意味着政府的政治决定取决于其过去的方向。在航天机构的计划中也可以观察到同样的现象。确实,参与国际太空舞台的政府在如何制定和执行太空计划方面具有不同的制度,技术和科学背景。创新,组织,共享知识,民间社会参与。涉及同一计划的太空大国之间的技能转移,翻译和交易是一件很重要的事情。例如,尽管具有技术水平,但阿拉伯联合酋长国的航天局在向前回顾和从过去的失败中学习或与公共机构打交道的能力方面,仍比美国国家航空航天局少。太空活动是所有关于从过去学习的内容。关于火星竞赛和国际合作,国际空间站无疑是一个很好的例子。在全球化的背景下,由于空间活动的成本,要求建立国际伙伴关系。因此,我们应该开始考虑建立性的政治模型,这种模型可以有效地安排长时间的载人航天飞行(甚至在未来几十年内超出我们的太阳系)。我们在这里提出的是对进一步发展的原始方式的介绍,以便使人类进入火星人的地盘。当前的演讲旨在为允许国际合作的接口提出一个社会学路线图,同时要意识到这种“历史依赖”会导致政府机构之间的知识和技能转让不平等和受到干扰。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号