首页> 外文会议>ASME international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering >HIGH PEAK STRAIN ON PIPELINE MATERIAL DURING REEL-LAY: ACCEPTABLE OR NOT?
【24h】

HIGH PEAK STRAIN ON PIPELINE MATERIAL DURING REEL-LAY: ACCEPTABLE OR NOT?

机译:卷轴铺设期间管道材料上的高峰值应变:是否可接受?

获取原文

摘要

The nominal strain occurring during installation of a pipeline by the reeling method is expected to be limited to 2-3% strain. This is only true if the pipeline has a perfect geometry (diameter, thickness) and homogeneous material properties along its length, resulting in a uniform bending stiffness. There will however always be a stiffness mismatch at the joints between pipes. Different scenarios can be considered as the cause of this stiffness mismatch: differences in average wall thickness and average yield stress of two pipe joints welded together, counterbored/machined pipe ends or field joint coating for pipes with thick coating. To some extent these scenarios can initiate high peak strains in the pipeline material far above the level of the expected nominal strain, exceeding in some cases 5% strain. Questions which might arise are: Could this high peak strain occurrence be ignored?, or: What is the impact of the high peak strain on the performance of the material after reeling ? This paper presents FEA results illustrating the concerns of the occurrence of large peak strains which can still be significant even after averaging these strains over the thickness as well as over a certain length of the pipe. The methodology of averaging strains, as proposed together with DNV GL, correlates the length of the averaging pipe section with the maximum length of the test specimen geometry as allowed when performing strain aging tests of specimens with high tension and compression strains. A series of cyclic plastic deformation tests with pre-strained specimens from 4% to 7% strain was performed with seamless pipe material, followed by the tensile, Charpy and hardness tests of strain aged samples. One of the challenges is the setup of the test machine to avoid buckling of specimens during high compression pre-straining. The results from material tests (tensile, hardness and Charpy) have been evaluated against the DNV-OS-F101 Supplementary requirement for plastic deformation (P). The consequences of material modification due to plastic strain is further discussed and evaluated referring to the DNV GL limit state design and criteria for pipeline installation after reeling as well as during the lifetime of the pipeline.
机译:预计通过绕线法在管道安装过程中出现的标称应变仅限于2-3%应变。仅当管道具有完美的几何形状(直径,厚度)并且沿其长度方向具有均匀的材料特性(导致均匀的弯曲刚度)时,这才是正确的。但是,在管道之间的接头处总会出现刚度不匹配的情况。各种不同的情况都可以认为是造成这种刚度不匹配的原因:焊接在一起的两个管接头,沉头孔/机加工的管端或用于厚涂层管的现场接头涂层的平均壁厚和平均屈服应力的差异。在某种程度上,这些情况可能会在管道材料中引发远高于预期标称应变水平的高峰值应变,在某些情况下会超过5%的应变。可能出现的问题是:可以忽略这种高峰值应变的发生吗?或者:高峰值应变对卷取后材料性能的影响是什么?本文提供了有限元分析结果,说明了对出现最大峰值应变的担忧,即使在管道的整个厚度以及一定长度上对这些峰值求平均后,这些峰值仍然很重要。与DNV GL一起提出的平均应变方法,在对具有高张力和压缩应变的试样进行应变时效试验时,将平均管段的长度与试样几何形状的最大长度相关联。使用无缝管材料对从4%到7%应变的预应变试样​​进行了一系列循环塑性变形测试,然后进行了应变时效试样的拉伸,夏比和硬度测试。挑战之一是如何设置测试机,以避免在高压缩预应变过程中样品弯曲。材料测试的结果(拉伸,硬度和夏比)已根据DNV-OS-F101塑性变形的补充要求(P)进行了评估。参照DNV GL极限状态设计和收卷后以及管道寿命期间管道安装的标准,进一步讨论和评估由于塑性应变而导致的材料改性的后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号